Makiterr

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You replied to a comment that said the reuploads are copyright infringement, calling it "Wrong", citing the TOS.

And in one of your other comments quoting the TOS, you explicitly say that they state the streams are in public domain (a copyright term), when the TOS actually say they are public information.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Gosh, you seem to care about this a lot...

Which is weird, because we seem to be in agreement about a major part:

Is it morally wrong? Sure, I guess.

Was it predictable that it would be recorded and redistributed? Sure. But that still doesn't make it right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'm not quoting anything. I'm saying the TOS say it's public information, not that they are giving up their copyright (which would be public domain).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Public information is not the same as public domain. They still hold the copyright on the streams, making reuploads illegal.

Also, aside from legality, it's simply morally wrong. They consented to be watched once live (or, if they enabled recordings, until they delete the VOD), not for it to be shared around on third party sites forever - regardless what Chaturbate put in their TOS to cover their asses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Public information is not the same as public domain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@OP When you have continue session on, closing Firefox using burger menu->Quit restores all windows. I assume this will also keep the pins even without continue session.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nope, this feature has existed forever. They just changed the shortcut, previously it was Ctrl-shift-T for re-opening the last closed tab and Ctrl-shift-N for re-opening the last closed window.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Hat gereicht um auf gleich mehrere Kohorten von Schülern von klein bis groß absolut gar nichts zu geben.

Wovon sprichst du jetzt konkret?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ein wesentlicher Teil dürfte auch sein, dass der Artikel fast 9 Jahre alt ist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Vielleicht verstehe ich da als Nicht-Schweizer was nicht, aber warum steht das überhaupt zur Debatte, wenn es legal (und nicht nur straffrei) ist?

view more: ‹ prev next ›