Machinist3359

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah folks in crutical care at a hospital really have an option to act on the "leave your land and be a refugee elsewhere" message.

Ethnic cleansing or genocide, so kind to give a choice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hope you remember in 20 years you were posting genocide denial rhetoric in your free time and feel ashamed. Same points used un many other genocides.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Zero evidence, and portrays how little you know about the organization. Nice knee jerk against defending human rights though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

FWIW getting one of those disc suitcases can hold hundreds of dvds without taking up much space at all. If you rip backups, you can store it somewhere out of the way without too much clutter. Plus it's a very stable backup for the digital files.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Imagine having the time and resources to be such a shit in this way. The main thing is don't be a transphobe, but then a substantial secondary thing is get a life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately we need more militantly anti-white-supremacy institutions to make a dent in the problem, and what we get is an occasional report acknowledging the issue and candle vigils to 'raise awareness'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

To be a bit more precise, Signal is against federation from two angles:

  • Innovation: Signal values absolute control over the protocol so that they can more rapidly implement UX experiences scene in other modern messaging apps. It also eliminates malicious or outdated servers changing the UX between users. Ultimately folks won't blame the servers, they'll blame the app, and stop using it.

  • No rope for users: They seem pretty confident that the Apple-style of software and UX is right— if a user can change stuff enough to break it, they will. For secure messaging, they'd rather users have fewer choices to be sure it is secure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I find it funny that Lenin, love him or hate him, had the definitive take on The Economist 100 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'm somewhat tempted by B2 but $5/TB/mo feels a bit steep for a NAS.

For me that would be about $100/mo, and for OP that's $25/mo. It would only take a few months before buying a drive for off site cold backup would be more cost effective.

Considering their personal plan is $7/mo for unlimited TBs, it really invites hobbiests to find workarounds after their first TB. Unless I'm missing something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Great advice, but you lost me at going to the bank weekly :)

My flavor of crazy is I visit family across the country twice/year and drop off a full backup. A bit hard to recover but, nuke-proof.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

They also have lesson plans if you wanted to teach others: https://sec.eff.org

Though I haven't seen a cryptoparty near me in ages :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

However, existing contacts like debts or rent cannot raise as rapidly. Also some goods, namely those appealing to folks earning more than this new minimum, are less likely to change.

view more: ‹ prev next ›