LufyCZ

joined 2 years ago
[–] LufyCZ 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, fair enough I guess. Depends on her intent, which would be impossible to prove

[–] LufyCZ 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Could be fraud, she took the money under a false premise.

Hard to say though, not a lawyer

[–] LufyCZ 1 points 2 years ago

It gives them a loot more than ad watchers though. Especially on longer videos (it's based on watch time)

[–] LufyCZ 0 points 2 years ago

Worst case, they can keep chugging along without any changes, except maybe stopping the donation "nag".

[–] LufyCZ 0 points 2 years ago

What's you opinion on volunteering then? Maybe people do it because it makes them feel good that they're doing something they want to.

And they're not getting paid to do it.

Why not do something you enjoy and get paid while you're at it?

[–] LufyCZ 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's honestly kinda perplexing.

Everyone keeps talking about taxing the rich but when someone offers to give a nonprofit we all love a billion dollars it's suddenly the worst thing on the planet.

[–] LufyCZ 1 points 2 years ago

If the deal were real of course

[–] LufyCZ 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Honestly, they'd be stupid not to take it.

Imagine how much you could do with a billion. It'd perpetually sustain the organization, it'd allow them to hire translators and writers, resulting in better content for all of us.

Hell, I'd take it, and 99.9% of people on this planet would too.

[–] LufyCZ 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Have you considered that some people might actually enjoy their jobs?

I'm not saying you do but that's fine, but you're pretty much saying that working has to be boring and undesirable, which it absolutely doesn't have to be.

[–] LufyCZ 3 points 2 years ago

They are also often subsidized with interest from people who don't pay their cards off

[–] LufyCZ 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yes, pure html pages are so much better and nicer to use!

view more: ‹ prev next ›