Lime66

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Is anyone else tired of murderhobo being ascribed to anytime a party kills anything? "How dare you murderhobo that mindflayer!" "How dare you murderhobo that zombie!"

Now, while I get the point of the post is that the bandits are still people, my comment doesn't refute that point. The point of my comment is that a DND is expected to kill in the campaign sometimes, and calling the party murderhoboes for doing so every time it happens is kinda condescending. In addition, the bandits deliberately attempted to murder the party for their money. The adventurers fought back and weren't able to pay attention to how lethal their strikes were. It adds more realism to do as the post describes, but it doesn't make the bandits better people than the party

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Well, I did say "less than lethal or less lethal"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Abolish the Frozen Water Gestapo, and fuck the police

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Less than lethal or Less lethal. It's not non lethal because they can still kill you

[–] [email protected] 146 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I prefer freedom from windows to freedom of windows

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Inaccurate. That house has decent structural integrity despite being a cruel joke made by the architect, vibe code could never

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I've managed to find a few that can describe the Republicans:

  • Nazis
  • Neo-Nazis
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Because states continued to gerrymander with essentially no oversight except for one supreme court ruling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Because voting got harder for those people in that time. Because you know, the government usually does something in the span of four years

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Same thing happened with my ranger Durge before. At least my build needed the broodmother's revenge

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can persuade her no matter what usually

 

Tap for spoilerI'm on a resist durge run, and I'm wondering if I could still trigger the "kill your lover" scene after how handled the quest for Isobel.

The way I progressed after entering the shadow cursed lands was:

  • fought the shadows that ambushed the harper patrol and cursed yonas
  • Made my way to last light in, had the cutscene where Jaheira suspects you're a cultist and tries to kill you.
  • after getting her trust I talked with her inside the inn, refused to drink the wine.
  • I took a long rest before talking to Isobel
  • I talked to Isobel immediately after the long rest, then beat Marcus and the winged horrors.
  • at the next long rest, I got the quest to kill Isobel from Sceleritas. I told him something like "I'll consider it"
  • I then talked to Isobel, told her about the urge, then chose not to kill her in the dialogue.
  • the quest still hasn't shown up as me having failed to kill her, even after plenty of long rests.

Can I still get the "kill your lover" scene after how I progressed, or did I lock myself out of it? I should note, I have entered moonrise towers by now, but I did take plenty of long rests before then

52
Pigeon (lemmy.world)
 

Pigeon

 

Tap for spoilerI recently cleared the Selune Temple, killed all of the leaders except Minthara, who I just knocked out, have done the party and received directions from Halsin to the Moonrise Towers.

All good, right? I should just get to the mountains or the underdark and head to act 2, right? Issue is, the party is only at level 4 right now. I assume I should find some encounters, but I'm not sure what level I should get to, and if there are enough encounters left to get to that level. I currently can think of:

  • auntie Ethel's fight.
  • the goblin camp outside of the temple (this might be enough on its own
  • the encounter at the port in the putrid bog (where kagha was going to meet according to the note)

Will doing these be enough to get to a level where act 2 is accomplishable?

 

So if I were to be fighting tiamat, and I true polymorphed into another tiamat, would I be able to use fire breath against her, or would we need to do melee combat only? And would our claws be able to do anything to each other or would we have a stalemate?

 

My party recently:

  • Got to level 18

  • obtained the swords of kas

  • I have 17 levels in Bard and one in druid currently, because of that I can cast wish with the right feats, which I have currently.

  • my character recently reunited with her last living family member, her sister, who is now a warlock.

  • I want to nullify the deal, since the magic can't be taken away and having your soul gone sucks, but none of us know who the patron is.

  • Could we learn who through divination spells? And if so:

  • could a wish spell nullify the pact and un sell her soul? I would assume yes since the reality bending part is so ambiguous and encompassing

 

Today I noticed that after I first booted my computer, my motherboard's Bluetooth card wasn't detected. I need bluetooth to use my speakers because my soundcard doesn't have linux drivers(another problem for another day) so I went without sound today. But then when I restarted the computer to see if that would change anything regarding the Bluetooth, it,

a.) Didn't change anything about the Bluetooth driver, and B) now my 2.4g dongle doesn't work for me to connect my mouse(I can still use it wired though) and my wired keyboard doesn't work.

Both times I booted my noticed that systemd was shutting down udevd, which I have never noticed before. I know that udev is controls peripherals, so that is the most likely issue.

How would I go about fixing my computer?

Computer is running fedora 40 and has an MSI mpg B650 gaming edge wifi. I can send a hardware probe if necessary

 
 
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/24720114

SiegedSec, a collective of self-proclaimed “gay furry hackers,” has claimed credit for breaching online databases of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank that spearheaded the rightwing Project 2025 playbook. On Wednesday, as part of string of hacks aimed at organizations that oppose trans rights, SiegedSec released a cache of Heritage Foundation material.

In a post to Telegram announcing the hack, SiegedSec called Project 2025 “an authoritarian Christian nationalist plan to reform the United States government.” The attack was part of the group’s #OpTransRights campaign, which recently targeted rightwing media outlet Real America’s Voice, the Hillsong megachurch, and a Minnesota pastor.

In his foreword to the Project 2025 manifesto, the Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, rails against “the toxic normalization of transgenderism” and “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology.” The playbook’s other contributors call on “the next conservative administration” to roll back certain policies, including allowing trans people to serve in the military.

“We’re strongly against Project 2025 and everything the Heritage Foundation stands for,” one of SiegedSec’s leaders, who goes by the handle vio, told The Intercept.

 

I was planning on installing windows to my new ssd for a dualboot, but I noticed that windows installer didn't allow me to select the disk. I learned that it just installs to the drive that is marked as M2_1 in the bios. I thought that had something to do with boot order initially, but I'm not sure about that now. If it is boot order, my second ssd doesn't even show up in the boot order menu So:

  1. Does windows install to whatever is second in boot order or whatever is marked as M2_1 in the bios, and
  2. How can I edit this to prevent windows from nuking my main linux partition and using the empty ssd, and after the install, how should I make sure both drives are available to boot into?

Motherboard is MSI MS - 7E10

view more: next ›