Lavender

joined 2 months ago
[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Well this is a pathetic display of confident ignorance. I hope they don't have any institutional power.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's such bullshit. Not only can he not be innocent in their eyes, he's not even allowed to react to being sentenced to life in prison. He can't have a neck tattoo or natural hair, either.

It's also pretty heinous that this is posted on that particular subreddit.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's great that as a senator he can afford to have an abundance of caution.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

Graduate students could assist teachers if they were paid fairly for their work.

Nah, let's just pay the owner of an AI to misinform students.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, just that #metoo was taken out back and shot when holding sexual predators accountable meant holding Biden accountable too.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We had to get Biden elected, okay?!

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

There's nothing natural about Cuomo.

Also it's so disappointing that his actions that led to his fall from grace back then don't matter anymore.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

Are there some recent episodes where this happens?

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a difference between killing a general and bombing 3 nuclear reactors

This was the comment you corrected in regards to concerns about a potential world war. If you believe bombing nuclear sites is less of an escalation than bombing nuclear reactors, that's fine, but focusing on the inaccuracy didn't respond to the original concern and intended point - that killing a general is different from targeting three nuclear sites.

If the comment was corrected to read

There's a difference between killing a general and bombing 3 nuclear enrichment sites

Would their original point be any different?

That's why I described your response as splitting hairs. Instead of engaging with their point, you corrected a detail that didn't significantly change their concern about escalation of an international conflict.

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The US bombed a sovereign nation, does that not constitute an act of war, regardless of the target?

view more: ‹ prev next ›