LWD

deleted by creator

Let's approach your hypocrisy from a new angle, Hotznplotzn: If you believe the SCMP only posts CCP propaganda, then you have to contend with the fact that they have cited your pet website repeatedly. Examples:

• http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2111777/action-not-words-needed-foreign-access-china-markets-says-chamber
• https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3010914/china-needs-change-european-firms-say-many-doubt-it-will
• https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3178994/chinas-carbon-neutral-plan-lacks-urgency-and-transparency-eu */https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3117567/decoupling-could-be-death-knell-european-firms-china-report

So which is it: do you distrust everything the SCMP posts or not?

If you do, you'll have to disown your favorite NGO.

If you don't, you'll have to disown your comment.

This is the EU Chamber of Commerce

No, it's an NGO with a similar name that represents corporations in the EU.

they are critical of China's state of the economy.

So when you see a group based in Beijing, you choose to trust or distrust them based on whether they confirm your preexisting biases?

If you have any other metric, please let me know what it is. You also recently linked to a conspiracy website that sells "5G blockers" and colloidal silver.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

"Pause" and not "Stop" is concerning.

Is it just me, or was the addition of AI summaries basically predetermined? The AI panel probably would only be attended by a small portion of editors (introducing selection bias) and it's unclear how much of the panel was dedicated to simply promoting the concept.

I imagine the backlash comes from a much wider selection of editors.