Kyre

I too, am curious. I could totally be on board with this comment, or I could totally not be on board with this comment. I do agree with the latter sentiment. There are some very creative and well thought-out systems out there.

My son is my step-son and his biological dad has hispanic and black ancestry. My dad once told me that "It's too bad he's black" meaning that it's too bad he's black as his life will be more difficult for him and he won't have as high of achievements due to this fact. Great, so you have just accepted that we have an unfair and imbalanced society yet continue to tell me that this country is too woke and everyone has an equal advantage and there is no such thing as racial injustice. No old man, you are a fucking racist piece of shit.

We haven't spoken for 3 years.

I'll preface this by saying I didn't read the article, nor did I read any of the studies and underlying methodology so it has probably been addressed and corrected for but like a few of the other commentors have mentioned, by measuring it based upon consumption of a single item, it would be hard to see if it really just showed an indicator of overall consumption as opposed to a singular food being the cause.

Lets say one of our sample respondents consume 350g of red meat on average in a week and that consisted of approximately 10% of their diet (by weight). Compare that to a person who had 350g of red meat on average in a week and it consisted of approximately 5% of their diet (by weight). This would be an Extreme example but the second person is literally consuming twice the amount of food (by mass).

This seems to be a strategic engagement inducing comment but I'll bite.

One additional piece of obvious information will probably adjust initial impressions of the above comment. So Harris "won" 20 states and Trump 30... so using some napkin math and by looking at that statement on it's surface (I noticed you didn't actually make a claim one way or the other) that means.... Harris states, on average, generate roughly 30% more GDP than Trump states.

Edit: Punctuation

Edit Edit: Harris is 19 + DC and Trump 31 so it's actually closer to 32-34% (If you count DC or not).

Because the audience is not his future co-workers, it's the managers and hiring staff who have problems that they need solved and are aware of the existing limitations that they have within the team.

Agreed. Look, if someone released a tape of trump being peed on by a bunch of underage children, it would start a trend with trump supporters and everyone would be having pedo pee parties in support and solidarity. trump could literaly blow someones brains out in the oval office on live television and no one would fucking do anything. Putin is dangling a financial carrot over trump or one of trumps "investors" that has to do with money or power and that is the only reason. It's pure unadulterated corruption being broadcast live on a streaming service near you. Simple as that.

Musk has already started his own version of Hitler youth.

Just saw this today as well which apparently has recently become very popular for obvious reasons: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184

It's a WW2 manual written by the CIA on how to combat Fascism from the inside. As I think was mentioned in another thread, it has a lot of violent action in it as it was written for war time but contains a lot of similar thoughts. Some if it is honestly hilarious: "Jam paper, bits of wood, hairpins, and anything else that will fit, into the locks of all unguarded entrances to public buildings."

https://youtu.be/SncvSeJ8jK0?si=PuZE1LWor9_7ANSj

https://youtu.be/SncvSeJ8jK0?si=PNvqr4tGKVjeLRWQ

https://youtu.be/SncvSeJ8jK0?si=PNvqr4tGKVjeLRWQ

Never posted to Lemmy before, what is the right community for this?