yeah, probably shouldn't doesn't mean you can't though.
Just because you probably shouldn't yell at people, or swear at them, doesn't mean you can't or won't.
Not everything in this world is a binary, sometimes it's situationally appropriate, sometimes it's not, sometimes it's in between.
yeah, ultimately the only thing worse than unbridled bigotry, is misplaced accusations of bigotry. That's one of the unfortunate things with this problem, and similar ones like it, is that unless you judge it by the character of the context, it can be really wide sweeping sometimes.
anyway, i hope you have a swell day fren :)
yeah but who uses it like that? I don't. I just use it because i think it's a funny word and i think it has situational comedy potential.
I'm not going to seek out people with mental disorders and call them retarded, that'd be evil.
You're basically arguing because one person is a terrible person, that we should change to accommodate against them.
It feels like action, it feels like some kind of accomplishment that you got some progressive content creator railroaded off the internet because they had a dumb take on israel once or used the R slur at some point.
that's great, but does it actually accomplish anything? That's what really matters, it doesn't matter if you run some weirdo out of town because he moderately disagrees with you, if he just goes to the next town over, where more people are waiting for him...
true i hate winning, i hope we keep losing so we can keep up the facade of pretending to be good instead of actually doing something to solve the problem, because we would probably fuck up.
the importance of that relatively minor thing also matters though, we can't just purity test everybody for everything, even if it's objectively correct, not all of it matters.
teaming with what might as well be classified as terrorists, and literal drug trafficking cartels is kind of insane not gonna lie.
look man, you and i both hate the current trump admin ok, let's start there, and work on what we agree upon, and then we diverge when we get past that point.
And genetics were used to justify genocide and eugenics. By your logic are genetics absolutely evil?
genetics are a constant truth, so the argument should be based from the perspective that genetics mean something, in regards to genocide and eugenics, not that genetics itself is flawed, because genetics didn't create this perception, humans did.
edit: retards was a typo of regards lmao, what an unfortunate typo.
it's the internet, and this is a post about blackholes and a bird being recorded. This is a tad bit out of place for what it is, not surprised people downvoted it, probably because they thought it was irrelevant, oh well, that's the internet, sometimes people like what you have to say, other times they don't. Don't think about it too hard, at the end of the day it's just internet karma.
thats what a lot of AI is used for, just in different fields.
ah, yeah no that would do it, i wouldn't report shit like this either. People are entitled to posting their dogshit opinions on the internet (myself included lmao)