If not supporting genocide and authoritarianism
They support Israel?
If not supporting genocide and authoritarianism
They support Israel?
A liberal told me this gotcha:
Bolsheviks were just Russian Nationalist Imperialists! That's why they toppled the....uhhh.... the Tsar!
Rules Based International Order
I just love that the Western liberal media bends over backwards pretending this is completely normal, and Ukraine is not a proxy but an equal.
The whole pretense was that the West is supplying Ukraine because of morality. Now that's out of the window.
Meanwhile Russia is still winning on the battleground.
This report from PBS is what I've seen linked, and this one from Radio Free Europe ( )
In the PBS one they say that Russians gave medical treatment to "civilians who didn't pose a threat". But why would military age civilian men pose a threat to the Russian Army? Maybe because:
As Russian forces advance on Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, people all over the country are being urged by officials — and sometimes compelled by necessity — to fight back in whatever ways they can. The country’s former president is patrolling the city streets with a civilian defense force, armed with an AK-47. Civilians have been called to find their own weapons and make molotov cocktails — a type of crude, homemade explosive named, mockingly, after a former Soviet foreign minister.
Roughly 18,000 weapons have already been distributed in the Kyiv region, according to the government. At the country’s borders, Ukrainian guards have been stopping vehicles, looking for men between the ages of 18 and 60 who can help in the fight.
Not that you can excuse war crimes, but in the past couple of weeks Bucha is in the news cycle again and shitlibs are literally saying that "denying the Bucha massacre is the same as denying the Holocaust", which pretty weird considering literal Banderists are fighting for Ukraine, and Bandera is being rehabilitated...
What's also weird is if the Bucha massacre is the modus operandi of the Russian Army then there should be dozens of Buchas, while most civilian deaths in the war are from artillery and bombing
Is there anything definitive about the Bucha massacre?
Obviously I am very sceptical about atrocity propaganda from the West, but it's not like Russian soldiers are above killing civilians... (still, the war in Ukraine seems like a different kind of war than Gaza which is purely oppressive ethnic cleansing)
I remember couple months after the news came out Seth Harp said that all the Western journalists reporting on the Bucha massacre got a curated picture of it (as in it was not some kind of investigative journalism that uncovered it, but the Ukrainian National News Agency put them on the bus like a group of tourists and led them to the [purported] scene of the massacre and Azov corralled them around the village.)
Why didn't the EU diplomats just convince Putin he's wrong about the world after his Munich speech?
Oh he's an evil madman with thousands of nukes you can't reason with? I guess we should escalate the war then
Peak liberal logic
People committing genocides devise moral frameworks to justify them.
western media uses short clips from the Russian alexjoneses like Dugin as proof for genocidal Russian imperial expansionism
The West always needs atrocity propaganda to drum up war fervor
VOLODYMYR STOP
"One of the scenarios is… to give up territory. It's not fair. But for the peace, temporary peace, maybe it can be a solution, temporary,"
VLADIMIR STOP
What the fuck are you even talking about? Are you lost?