I think the same group that doesn’t want immigrants to be on “welfare” are the same that want a border to prevent them from entering the US to begin with. They’d likely argue that the $775/night wouldn’t happen if they couldn’t enter to begin with.
KamikazeRusher
joined 2 years ago
Should’ve sold some copies of the Christmas Star Wars episode
I’m worried about the security of this. However looking past that and simply observing it as an implementation of AI, this is an idea that I think is actually a beneficial use. Protecting the elderly against fraud/scams is a major issue which gets increasingly complex as scammers improve their methods. Using AI to detect scams in calls could be helpful in protecting the elderly.
But before rolling it out, I would want to see proof of its efficiency through careful studies. Hell, incentivize Google to share the model with the government and other businesses so it can be improved upon. Fund it as a grant/program so smaller teams/companies can contribute and innovate.
I think it would’ve been funny if the title was “StackOverflow contributors are revolting” and the comment was “a little more than usual.”
But hey, gotta get whatever amount of humor in while you can.
whatever the Indian equivalent is
Uncle Vivek
That’s better than sending the newhire back to HQ to get the cable stretcher.
No thanks, I prefer my hotdogs 🅱️ONELESS
And the Chamber of Commerce is undoubtedly going to sue in court this week to have it overturned while telling us that it’s actually pro-employee to not be able to work elsewhere because of overreaching NCAs.
Oh wait…
Network switches with over 10 years of uptime chuckle nervously
It's not symmetrical yet though. Which is weird.
Eh, I would say it’s to be expected. A lot of infrastructure still relies on coax/DOCSIS which has its limitations in comparison to an all-fiber backbone. (This post has some good explanations.) However it wouldn’t surprise me if some ISPs argue that “nobody needs that much uplink” and “it helps restrict piracy” when really it’s just them holding out against performing upgrades.
So somehow our representatives are fine with auto-enrollment of citizens for the draft, but a number of them oppose auto-enrollment for voting?