JustMy2c

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Thatchers plan would have worked if and only when:

LAND IS PROVIDED FOR NEW PROJECTS (destination plan on national provincial and local level)

ALL INCOME FROM RENT TO BUY (or similar) IS SPEND ON NEW PROJECTS

ALL PROJECTS ARE GUARANTEED BY THE BUILDER (no excess costs for any reason : sign your profitable contract but then you are obliged to deliver exactly what is promised or you'll never get another gov project again)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

No, it would BE BOUGHT by government at fair price (they know the fair price, just look your houses tax bill)

Or built by them.

And then rented out with a certain maximum rental price per Sq Mt like 10$ so 50sq m (500sq ft) = 500$/month

Most importantly, they would be obliged to make it Energy efficient by their contract with the state so much lower electric and heating bill, maybe even topped off with solar, would be small percentage of a new building but cut costs for actual people.

Not saying it's perfect in Holland (they have shortages because no new land available to build new social housing projects), but it sure works!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I Holland we have woning bouw organisaties That are BY law obliged to offer services and structured management, checked by impartial state department and who can be relieved of function (transfering the properties to another organization or splitting them up etcetera). Yes, needs to be overview, laws and such. Maybe even subsidies for new buildings.

But NO PROFIT ANYWHERE.

Not for public basic housing. Come on, do we really wanna admit RUZZIA and CHINA beat us on this?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Get rid of excess money ? Turns out being extremely rich isn't that rewarding, especially once everyone knows.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

CHRISTIANITY HAS ALWAYS BEEN USED TO FOOL ABUSE AND TERRORIZE THE PEOPLE. NOW IS NO EXCEPTION.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

In a natural baked pottery the water is pretty ok to drink. Not cold but DEFINITELY not warm.

My only preferred sugar intake is imported 7 year old panamenian ABUELO rum. Highly recommended much better as a 12yo whiskey and just 19.95$ usd

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Correcto but maybe it DOES apply to most asked questions, if you know where I'm going with that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, it is indeed from the counter from a ten year old ceramic dispenser.

It keeps it moderately acceptable to drink, really. I live in hot Ecuador and no ac in main rooms except master bedroom

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

YES THE SUGAR FREE SODA ACT IS VERY IMPORTANT.

1$/L TAX FOR ALL SUGAR AND SUGAR REPLACEMENT AND JUICE. NO EXCEPTIONS.

Really, you don't need sugar for a good drink (unless distilled).

Ice cold lemonade from extract or mint from extract is LITERALLY only water.

Ps Drink room temp water and you won't even want any cold drinks ever again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Obviously but reddit is in the goldilocks zone where you get coherent intelligent stuff and humor and facts.

But it's still toxic for an Ai.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

This is a thruth beyond initial comprehension.

It is true for most supermarket foods.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Suspect.... Not convict.

So An investigator can check it out. Nothing more

view more: ‹ prev next ›