JustJack23

Anarchist and [email protected] (or other anti-fashist communities) as well as [email protected] I would suggest

Please do not, fuck ai

most of these figures and how they succeeded only because...

I am talking about the figures on the picture and not all of them at that.

I do not have the context for all liberation movements in history by far.

There is concept on the left called "critical support" it broadly means we agree with that one thing you are doing, but we also do not agree with other things.

In this case we can say: For sure killing LGBTQ+ people is not good, but striking a country that is currently carrying out a genocide is a good thing.

P.S. if you have better source for critical support please send.

Et tu, Brute?

There is a book "how to blow up a pipeline" that talks about most of these figures and how they succeeded only because the existence of more radical and violent wings of their movements. It is a good read.

I do not have a foldable and will not get one for a very simple reason, the moving parts are always first to break. I personally care most about longevity of my tech so that is a no-go for me.

Isn't that their revenue for a quarter? If so this is nothing...

Yeah it makes sense, I do agree knifes should not be sold to children.

Knifes are not only for cooking, and they are just fun to play around with, when I was a kid we built makeshift shelters in the forest near the town with knifes and hammer and even a saw.

The problem is not the knife, but the children not being property disciplined on how to use them. Restrictions on this common of an item will never work because even if you make the perfect system so no child can ever buy one, they will just get one from home or use a broken piece of glass.

There are a lot of dangerous things in our world, restricting the access to them is just impossible and frankly stupid.

Next time a child throws a rock at another will you ban rocks too?

I read somewhere about that and the theory was that this is intentional, a big chunk of his base are functionally illiterate and talking like this makes him just understandable. Add to this the fact that speaking like this makes him sound very nonpatronizing. Finally it's good marketing, it's the same thing Ben Shapiro does in his annoying argument voice. Now that I think about it even Obama has a very easily distinguishable way of speaking.

All that to say, it is a conscious choice imo.