JakenVeina

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing Vance said something insulting about Appalachia.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's the capability of a program to "reflect" upon itself, I.E. to inspect and understand its own code.

As an example, In C# you can write a class...

public class MyClass
{
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        ...
    }
}

...and you can create an instance of it, and use it, like this...

var myClass = new MyClass();
myClass.MyMethod();

Simple enough, nothing we haven't all seen before.

But you can do the same thing with reflection, as such...

var type = System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly()
    .GetType("MyClass");

var constructor = type.GetConstructor(Array.Empty<Type>());

var instance = constructor.Invoke(Array.Empty<Object>());

var method = type.GetMethod("MyMethod");

var delegate = method.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action), instance);

delegate.DynamicInvoke(Array.Empty<object>());

Obnoxious and verbose and tossing basically all type safety out the window, but it does enable some pretty crazy interesting things. Like self-discovery and dynamic loading of plugins, or self-configuration of apps. Also often useful when messing with generics. I could dig up some practical use-cases, if you're curious.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's known, recently, as the "pig butchering" scam, and this is the telltale opener. The idea is that you respond with "hey, you've got the wrong number" and they can then open a dialog of "oh, sorry about that" and then spend weeks or months just conversing with you casually to build a "heh, what a crazy way to meet a new friend" sorta relationship. Eventually, they spring some kinda ask for money or malware on you, because they earned your trust.

Give it a google, it's pretty fucked up, and completely counter-intuitive how effective and profitable it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Goddamn, I completely missed that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I think they're a decent chance that's what they mean, anyway. "What, no, what the hell would we want with your shitty social media software? Just give us the domain name."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Me, it's not the size of the blueprint, particularly since they added 5x5 and 6x6 blueprints in 1.0, it's the fact that blueprint placement is horrendous for seemingly everything except perfectly-rectangular structures. And non-rectangular structures are basically the ENTIRETY of thing the things that are difficult to build, and thus worth blueprinting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

My wife and I have been putzing with coal power and blueprints and experimenting with architecture for 3 days now. Haven't really done anything productive in that time. Have completed Tier 3, and part of Tier 4.

I'm on the verge of declaring blueprints to be more trouble than they're worth. Anyone else?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're interested in detail, I can recommend this book: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ncGVPtoZPHcC.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I'm also neither a mod nor member. I have never posted nor commented in c/vegan. I do not habitually downvote posts from c/vegan. I am banned from c/vegan, as of about a week ago.

If that isn't overreach, I dunno what is.

If they don't want non-members to be able to vote or comment on their stuff, that's fine, take the community private.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Cashier stations with chairs are VERY rare, yes. The general trope is that managers/owners think it makes workers appear lazy.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago

Cashier stations with chairs are VERY rare, yes. The general trope is that managers/owners think it makes workers appear lazy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cashier stations with chairs are VERY rare, yes. The general trope is that managers/owners think it makes workers appear lazy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›