IzyaKatzmann

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

this has to be satire right? the invoking iq part cant be serious

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

After the event, analysts at Jeffries published a note titled “We, underwhelmed.”

this had me laughing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

this is great! do daily headlines in the fakenews comm pls

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

did your feet get sore when you first started wearing the barefoot style shoes?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

ty, great resource i appreciate the share

07

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

it's ok us older folk will get the cut of your jibe

sanae-boomer

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you mostly walk around urban areas? the photo looks like a hiking trail, curious how it might hold up since i tend to wear trail runners

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

the soles look rad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ye, this is a newer one i liked. tone is more informal compared to whipping girl which i read as more academic.

you have a gem like this about the loops of reasoning terfs and co. use to define sex

'biological' definition of sex


In apparent recognition of this giant hole in their logic, some gender-critical activists have taken to adding qualifiers to their claims, for instance, saying that females are “the sex that all going well produces large immobile gametes (eggs),” or who “do or did or will or would, but for developmental or genetic anomalies, produce eggs.” Those links will take you to critiques of such qualifying language and their unforeseen ramifications.

view more: ‹ prev next ›