InnerScientist

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Burns just a little bit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there a self hosted version of it/something like it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only way to completely fix it is to make the services be compatible, so that people can switch without the downside of leaving people behind.

This is complicated and has downsides though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

*Chooses "no, I don't respond to surveys"*

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No matter what your stance on Trump is, you must agree that it isn't completely outside the realm of possibilities.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I wonder if anyone believed them at the time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And systemd requires notify about this intention every time.

Systemd requires a one time fee of loginctl enable-linger myserviceuser to never kill processes with a timeout for that user again. This behavior also doesn't affect system users, only normal users.

I think the main purpose nowadays is to stop pipewire and other user services that don't need to consume resources when that user isn't logged in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I think s6 may be newer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

If you run screen/tmux built without systemd support, it will be killed on logout.

Actually, if you run anything and logout, it will be killed after a timeout. The way to prevent this in systemd land is to enable-linger for that user.

IMO this is a pretty sane default and it's easy enough to disable for users

EDIT: For non-root users

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

....you assumed correctly, runit first released 2004, meanwhile systemd released 2010

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm talking about software RAID, for example btrfs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Most RAID levels are for redundancy, not speed and software RAID doesn't need drives of the same size.

view more: next ›