Insane to me to see people just play calvinball with their own made up bullshit.
"Oh Stockholm Syndrome isnt real? Actually its plainly obvious in thousands of abused women" like NO that is not what the fucking syndrome is about in the slightest what are you talking about? Stockholm Syndrome is when someone is hostile to you but you like them anyways?
And then also the fucking shit with like "Oh its not real? Then why does the FBI say it happens in 8% of kidnapping victims?" and its like, because there are made up criteria that claim to be the result of some actual hyperspecific situation in the brain, and sooner or later someone will correspond to those criteria but that doesnt validate the hypothesis behind it!
The sun actually setting doesnt validate the hypothesis that theres a guy pulling the sun on a chain to do it!
I think that Stockholm Syndrome really is just taking one overarching and surface level "symptom" of a captive or subjugated person having "sympathy" for the one holding them captive or subservient, and just ascribing one monolithic brain prank to the whole thing when theres actually rather direct material reasons why it might happen in each individual case.
With hostage taking theres obviously the matter of the police/military threatening the hostages by not negotiating and instead using lethal force, with intimate partner abuse the person being abused often has no other way to provide for the basics of existence and has to rely on their abuser, who they presumably at one point did love and is now stuck with, thats more complicated than a short term hostage taking but the reasons largely dont particularly overlap.
Or like looking at cults which is another occurence of this, where you now actually have a communal occurence of abuse and often a complete ideological and cultural isolation from the outside world, this again is very complex and the overlap isnt that huge with the other cases. To suggest that all of this is fundamentally the same brain prank seems reductive at best and IMO it just comes off like people are holding on to an "established" conclusion and refusing to let it go.
It would be a serious stroke of luck for an obvious police discrediting campaign against a woman they endangered and left to die to actually have by happenstance revealed a fundamental cornerstone of psychology that actually is extremely valid and useful for every situation except the one it was invented for, that being short term hostage situations.