HopFlop

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you mind explaining why? It just seems kind of random...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

The push was to socially and legally punish these men who were accused without the usual evidence hats required.

Then "Believe All Women" is, in all honesty and I mean it, the stupidest demand I have ever heard. I'm baffled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except if it's warm milk with honey. That's your "hot chocolate" 2.0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Definitely true for some peoole. (Though before I switched to Linux, I couldn't have guessed how valuable it has now become to me and would have thought the same thing...)

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 years ago

Middle class? First class tickets were never for the middle class. Maybe it's just that

  • business class it good enough, even for rich people
  • American Airlines' first class is so bad that the first class passengers just go to other airlines...
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well ok but it's not on your eye, it's inside. Also, not sure if I would categorize blood cells as debris and they are not blurry... but nevermind, we both know what you're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Thats not true, they float around and your eye movement can kind of influence their direction.

They are actually blood cells or proteins floating around in the liquid inside your eyeball. There was this one building where I regularly went to for about a year and they had walls in a white color so bright that I saw these every single time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Those tiny tubes are normal to be in your eye but you usually don't notice them (they are body cells or proteins). Only when you are looking at something bright (eg. a completely white wall) do you see them. If you regularly see them and they dont go away if the room is less well lit then you should get it checked out though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because OP implied that the contract said 17$ and he had just not noticed (because he was promised 17.50$ in the interview). In that case, it is false that he has a right to the reamining 50ct per hour.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

So the year 10000000000000000000000 then...?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Hopefully you agree that having a society where it's legal to sell yourself into slavery would be bad

Absolutely, because this would be selling your freedom itself, that it unacceptable. There are certain rights that you shouldn't be able to abandon.

[...] when you strive for the ideal of renting yourself out, only people with no other options do it.

Well, there will always be a "worst option", no matter what. However, doing work for someone that you wish to do work for and getting payed for it according to your time and skills sounds good to me.

There's a reason there are 0 millionaires taking on wage

Even though this is not really relevant to the duscussion, I think you're overlooking quite a large number of high-payed professionals, freelancers and people in management positions.

We don't do it [work] of our own will, but rather because society demands it of us if we want [...]

Yeah but isn't that the case in every economic system? Sure, you could make basic life necessities a default but that can exist under capitalism too. You shouldn't have the right to get everything you want without working.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So in a communist sosciety you wouldnt need those good stories but because of "our capitalistic hellscape" you do? How come? What has this story have to do with capitalism? Absolutely nothing! You just had to rub your (unreasoned) opinion into everyone's face.

view more: ‹ prev next ›