HootinNHollerin

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HootinNHollerin 0 points 3 days ago

The US is more the puppet of Israel imo

[–] HootinNHollerin 4 points 3 days ago

DW and BBC the same

[–] HootinNHollerin 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Looks like they’re setting up a ton of Funktion One speakers for a sweet rave

[–] HootinNHollerin 2 points 4 days ago

Arby’s Horseradish sauce

[–] HootinNHollerin 2 points 4 days ago

How the heck do we become more decisive

[–] HootinNHollerin 5 points 4 days ago

For the local population yes contamination but Meltdown no

[–] HootinNHollerin 5 points 4 days ago

Just voters id bet

[–] HootinNHollerin 1 points 5 days ago

Bastrop is outside austin and is a hub of elon / tesla bullshit btw

[–] HootinNHollerin 1 points 5 days ago

Rome, Lilyhammer

[–] HootinNHollerin 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

the Sam Altman tears line at the end was hilarious

9
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by HootinNHollerin to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/20805596

Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records involving self-driving robotaxis

 

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/197685

Open Source Watch Movement Really Ticks All the Boxes

When you think of open-source hardware, you probably think of electronics and maker tools– RepRap, Arduino, Adafruit, et cetera. Yet open source is an ethos and license, and is in no way limited to electronics. The openmovement foundation is a case in point– a watch case, to be specific. The “movement” in Openmovement is a fully open-source and fully mechanical watch movement.

Openmovement has already released STEP files of OM10 the first movement developed by the group. (You do need to sign up to download, however.) They say the design is meant to be highly serviceable and modular, with a robust construction suited for schools and new watchmakers. The movement uses a “Swiss pallets escapement” we think that’s an odd translation of lever escapement, but if you’re a watchmaker let us know in the comments), and runs at 3.5 Hz / 25,200 vph. An OM20 is apparently in the works, as well, but it looks like only OM10 has been built from what we can see.

If you don’t have the equipment to finely machine brass from the STEP files, Openmovement is running a crowdfunding campaign to produce kits of the OM10, which you can still get in on until the seventh of June.

If you’re wondering what it takes to make a mechanical watch from scratch, we covered that last year. Spoiler: it doesn’t look easy. Just assembling the tiny parts of an OM10 kit would seem daunting to most of us. That might be why most of the watches we’ve covered over the years weren’t mechanical, but at least they tend to be open source, too.


From Blog – Hackaday via this RSS feed

 

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/196097

The OrcaSlicer staggered perimeters in an FDM print, after slicing through the model. (Credit: CNC Kitchen)The OrcaSlicer staggered perimeters in an FDM print, after slicing through the model. (Credit: CNC Kitchen)

The idea of staggered (or brick) layers in FDM prints has become very popular the past few years, with now nightly builds of OrcaSlicer featuring the ‘Stagger Perimeters’ option to automate the process, as demonstrated by [Stefan] in a recent CNC Kitchen video. See the relevant OrcaSlicer GitHub thread for the exact details, and to obtain a build with this feature. After installing, slice the model as normal, after enabling this new parameter in the ‘Strength’ tab.

In the video, [Stefan] first tries out a regular and staggered perimeter print without further adjustments. This perhaps surprisingly results in the staggered version breaking before the regular print, which [Stefan] deduces to be the result of increasing voids within the print. After increasing the extrusion rate (to 110%) to fill up said voids, this does indeed result in the staggered part showing a massive boost in strength.

What’s perhaps more telling is that a similar positive effect is observed when the flow is increased with the non-staggered part, albeit with the staggered part still showing more of a strength increase. This makes it obvious that just staggering layers isn’t enough, but that the flowrate and possibly other parameters have to be adjusted as well to fully realize the potential of brick layers. That said, it’s encouraging to see this moving forward despite questionable patent claims.


From Blog – Hackaday via this RSS feed

 
32
Cool dude (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 
43
Sandy Eggo, California (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by HootinNHollerin to c/[email protected]
 

.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/30660260

Piss off!

 
view more: next ›