HiddenLayer555

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Even if he did, are we pretending this congress will say no? When they haven't so much as even objected to all the other blatantly illegal shit he's done?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

Is that the whataboutism they keep accusing us of?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Radiation, in this context, is light. Everything from old school AM radio, to microwaves, to infrared, to visible light, to UV, and finally gamma rays are all just photons. For light, there are two energy metrics: how much energy the individual photons have, and how many photons are being emitted per unit of time. Only the energy level of the individual photons determine if the radiation is ionizing, as in, powerful enough to rip electrons off what it hits, including important molecules like DNA. Ionizing radiation starts at the UV range, so anything below that is not ionizing. This is why you can get skin cancer from UV but no amount of visible light can cause cancer. And microwaves are well below even visible light so they aren't ionizing either.

Also, Wi-Fi and cellular networks operate in the microwave range. In fact, your microwave oven is 2.4 GHz, which is what older Wi-Fi equipment exclusively used, which is why your Wi-Fi connection used to crap out when you microwaved something. The reason you don't feel your hand heating up from the microwave rariation coming out of your phone is because the number of microwave photons per second being emitted by your phone is far less than a microwave oven. Your phone's antennas are 1 or 2 watts while your microwave is over 1000 watts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Another case of piracy having far superior user experience compared to the legal, honest way of playing the game, not because piracy is intrinsically better but because the publisher deliberately makes the official experience as inconvenient and exploitative as possible.

I used to have a git repo in my emulator's save directory so I could have checkpoints that I can restore to if I ever get stuck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Does Pokemon have microtransactions now? If so, I wouldn't be surprised if they deliberately made the transfer mechanism buggy so some kid loses all their Pokemon and their parents are forced to buy them back to get them to stop crying.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is why the "nothing to hide nothing to fear" line is bullshit. You can be a model citizen and there will still be people actively trying to use your data to harm you.

Would you leave your door unlocked just because you're not hiding illegal activity in your house?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can fit millions of books on a chip the size of your fingernail.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The nearly 5,000 soldiers in Los Angeles detained one man, briefly. Was that worth $134 million and a constitutional crisis?

Yes.

Because it sets a precedence. Trump's MO has been to try more and more insane shit until the bar for what's normal shifts so far that people get desensitized and start thinking all of this is fine.

It's also shown that the systems that are supposed to be in place to stop things like this don't actually work. The first time someone in the government actually tried to defy those systems, they all either failed to kick in to begin with or were easily shut down or bypassed. Which is music to fascist ears.

All of this has been a massive success for Trump, Musk, and fascism in general. Meanwhile even mainstream anti-Trump media has been burying their head in the sand pretending that Trump is incompetent and has not done anything meaningful toward fascism, when in reality he's been getting everything he wants. That should be terrifying to everyone else yet it really seems that most people in the US, even those against Trump, just aren't getting it and are just trying to wait out the four years as if he'll actually step down then.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

That's exactly why they're trying to ban it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Obviously I'm not saying I want Israli civilians killed. I don't want that any more than I want Iranians and Palestinians killed.

That said, I'm finding it really hard to feel any sympathy for them.

 

I think the only thing worse than something not being private, is if the fact that it's not private is not common knowledge leading to tons of people thinking it's private.

Lemmy doesn't even show a list of what you the logged in user voted on. But it's trivial to use an external tool to see who voted on what regardless of whose account it is. I think obsecuring information like this does more harm than good, since a lot of people won't actively go out and research what kind of data in their Lemmy account is publicly accessible beyond the data they can see from the website itself.

It's been discussed before that there isn't an easy way to hide who voted for what on a federated platform while still having all the instances correctly count votes for everyone. Therefore, if actually making votes anonymous seems not to be viable, why not just make it public for everyone like Mastodon does? I don't think we should make them inbox items like on Mastodon, or at least not the same inbox as the rest of the notifications so votes don't drown them out. I think a dropdown on the content itself showing who voted on it and in which direction is probably enough. Also a tab on the user page showing a list of everything the user voted on, at least on the logged in user's own page (I mainly want this so I can keep track of what I voted on).

 

Everyone talks about how evil browser fingerprinting is, and it is, but I don't get why people are only blaming the companies doing it and not putting equal blame on browsers for letting it happen.

Go to Am I Unique and look at the kind of data browsers let JavaScript access unconditionally with no user prompting. Here's a selection of ridiculous ones that pretty much no website needs:

  • Your operating system (Isn't the whole damn point of the internet that it's platform independent?)
  • Your CPU architecture (JS runs on the most virtual of virtual environments why the hell does it need to know what processor you have?)
  • Your JS interpreter's version and build ID
  • List of plugins you have installed
  • List of extensions you have installed
  • Your accelerometer and gyroscope (so any website can figure out what you're doing by analyzing how you move your phone, i.e. running vs walking vs driving vs standing still)
  • Your magnetic field sensor AKA the phone's compass (so websites can figure out which direction you're facing)
  • Your proximity sensor
  • Your keyboard layout
  • How your mouse moves every moment it's in the webpage window, including how far you scroll, what bit of text you hovered on or selected, both left and right clicks, etc.
  • Everything you type on your keyboard when the window is active. You don't need to be typing into a text box or anything, you can set a general event listener for keystrokes like you can for the mouse.

If you're wondering how sensors are used to fingerprint you, I think it has to do with manufacturing imperfections that skew their readings in unique ways for each device, but websites could just as easily straight up record those sensors without you knowing. It's not a lot of data all things considered so you likely wouldn't notice.

Also, canvas and webGL rendering differences are each more than enough to 100% identify your browser instance. Not a bit of effort put into making their results more consistent I guess.

All of these are accessible to any website by default. Actually, there's not even a way to turn most of these off. WHY?! All of these are niche features that only a tiny fraction of websites need. Browser companies know that fingerprinting is a problem and have done nothing about it. Not even Firefox.

Why is the web, where you're by far the most likely to execute malicious code, not built on zero trust policies? Let me allow the functionality I need on a per site basis.

Fuck everything about modern websites.

 

If you're truly honest, you'd say yes.

If you weren't honest, you'd lie and say yes.

If you were truly honest and say no, then you're not being honest about your honesty.

If you weren't honest and say no, then you're being honest which is a paradox.

view more: next ›