You're referring to "bubble foam tea", which refers to the foam.
"Bubble tea" is something different and refers to the tapioca pearls.
At least, that's the distinction Wikipedia gives, which seems to match the given origins of bubble tea
You're referring to "bubble foam tea", which refers to the foam.
"Bubble tea" is something different and refers to the tapioca pearls.
At least, that's the distinction Wikipedia gives, which seems to match the given origins of bubble tea
Maybe they specifically picked men with increased risk?
Half sounds pretty nuts otherwise.
Schiermonnikoog in the Netherlands isn't really car-free though
You clearly don't get it. This is not about what they eat.
If you mix two chemicals, they react the same way. It doesn't matter if this happens inside a mouse or a human.
Their reaction to it might be different, which is what the article ponts out. But the gut biome still compares to what's inside a human, so if you introduce something like red meat, the measured reaction inside will be similar, even if it's not in their diet, like you shallowly point out.
Not what the research is about though, but good doing your own research
"genocide narrative"
No need to continue reading, another Zionist troll
I think, at least in Belgium, emptying tires is actually not a punishable offense, as long as you don't damage the tires. It's something activists have been doing for a while with these types of cars.
I assume you went through the actual published article and have the necessary expertise to come to this "bullshit" conclusion.
I don't really know enough about mouse (and human) gut biome to know what the similarities and caveats are.
Seriously, what psycho squishes a ladybug?
Seems the comparison is just clickbait. Entirely different technologies for different use cases, its a bullshit article
I just can't figure out by what logic Kay is criminal. Feels like I am misunderstanding some phrasing.