Haha, after you explained it the first one makes sense, this one is more clear however. I like it, thank you :3
HappyFrog
joined 2 years ago
Lmao. Yeah, I don't use auto-complete and rarely re-read things when I write, so mistakes are bound to happen :P
Yeah, I was thinking that if any organization would do AI summaries right, it would be Wikipedia. But I trust the editors the most.
Wikipedia would probably be the only organization that I would trust with AI. They've been using it for a while now to flag sections that might need to be rewritten, but they don't let the AI write anything itself, only notify human editors that there might be a problem. Or, at least that was what I heard a couple of ywars ago when they talked about it last.
Lol, how will they get any contributions if they explicitly say that trans girls are not welcome? You know who run the internet?
I mean, it's funny to laugh at nazis.
Lmao, they even tried to say that they learned it from Dave Chapel (I think, it's hard to understand) a few comments down like that makes it better. He literally used it in reference to jewish people, like come on.
Or don't use Epic at all.
Ah! I see, very clever.
Also, how posh of you to sign your name at the end.
Rescue breaths are still necessary when resuscitating someone who experienced cardiac arrest due to oxygen deprivation.
https://cpreducatorsinc.com/is-rescue-breathing-still-used-in-cpr/
That's so little water for a bath, though
While I hate AI, I hate copyright even more. I want copyright protections to erode as much as possible, but the AI-specific exceptions that has seem to pop up is not filling me with hope. The current laws are trash and we shouldn't want to expand the power Disney holds even more, it will only hurt artists.