GunnarRunnar

Tf is "speech" then if not communicating lol

Who is talking about it being illegal?

And obviously you're deincentivising the creator from making more content in that certain style at least. Steering the speech to certain direction.

This conversation wasn't about free speech, it was about companies fiddling with speech.

I'm not following? Free speech usually means that you have freedom to express yourself, not that you're speaking for no pay lol.

Yeah, algorithmically copying one's style with out permission isn't the same thing as a human mirroring art. It's not a skill.

You can create art with AI for sure but it's nothing but a tool (at least for now). And it's unethical to use art without permission in this context where it literally algorithmically copies the material.

It already exists. Just look how YouTube demonetizes whatever.

I'd presume someone like EU would be interested in this.

And that's pretty clearly how it should be.

Schadenfreude is real with this one but I have to wonder will it last. No doubt Reddit will be smaller after this (as it already is from like 55M to 52M users) but they'll eventually get their shit somewhat together, maybe it'll demand admins to be more hands-on by changing mods etc. (since the ones picked in a rush won't be all winners).

Either way it'll probably a lot more straining on corporate end when for now Reddit itself has been pretty hands off. I don't think it'll die over night or a year even. It'll slowly dwindle until there's nothing but wasteland with few stubborn users.

Well I had successfully avoided it until this thread lol.

Is bing actually still just bad? Google just pushes stores for search results when I'm just trying to figure out how shit works so I'm so ready to switch permanently.