We've already established that a lot of people will recommend Mint. What do you think, why do a lot of people recommend Mint?
I disagree. Obviously the most ideal solution would be the have immutable Mint, but beginners need stability more than they do immutability. I've used mint and my only issue with Mint was that I didn't like how it looked. I'm currently on Bazzite and these are the issues I've ran into:
Every time I start Firefox it asks to be made into the default browser. Even if I click yes it will still ask again next time I start Firefox.
When using the default audio sometimes the audio signal to my monitor cuts off which means I no audio comes from the speakers. If I tell the system to send the audio to my other monitor and back to the one I have hooked on the speakers then it instantly works again. It's almost like the system forgets it has to send out audio. I don't remember what I did to fix it but it definitely wasn't beginner friendly.
Sometimes one of the monitors freezes and only one. The second monitor keeps working just fine. So far haven't found a permanent solution for this issue.
There have also been some minor artifacting that I personally don't consider an issue but someone else might.
Overall I can put up with the issues because I've pretty much conceded that I'm going to have issues. But I don't think new users should be using a system where they're going to run into problems they're most likely not equipped to fix. That why I recommend Mint to newcomers because all the fancy bells and whistles don't matter if the system doesn't work. Mint doesn't have bells and whistles, but it just works.
There's no way Google would voluntarily sell Chrome. Unfortunately for them, they might be forced to sell Chrome.
Can you give one example where Bethesda has actually attacked the modding community?
They don't want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that's assuming they'd be successful enough to make it happen.
All the more reason to not do anything about it. Let America implode and their interventionist power also takes a hit.
I'm starting to feel like this is a controversial opinion, but maybe the American people should be the ones holding their own government accountable? Interventionism is the worst way to fix a country and I very much doubt it even could be done for a country like America.
Norris doesn't have the mentality to fight for the championship. He's good when the stakes are low but the higher the stakes get the more he starts to make mistakes. He simply gets stuck in his own head.
The telemetry shows both of them rushed into the corner because they were both fighting to be first into the apex, that's the game. Max didn't slow down because Piastri didn't slow down. It was a great move by Piastri, why do you have to diminish it by not acknowledging what Piastri did. Does Verstappen live rent free in your mind that you have to make everything about Max?
At that scale it's not kidnapping, it's ethnic cleansing.
Another thing to bring up for ancient greybeards like me, Oblivion is almost 20 years old. There's an entire generation of gamers who have never played Oblivion and are now getting their first time experience.
We've was it the best choice?