GoodEye8

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

But what George claims Max said does open up the question of George possibly lying. Or are you seriously going to believe "I would rather crash with you than give up my position" Verstappen said he wouldn't race George and would let him pass? Completely voluntarily and without any benefit to him? Not only would that be completely uncharacteristic of him, it makes no sense for him to say that and if he somehow did actually say that, why would he be pissed about the penalty if he's going to give the lead to Russell anyway? It makes no sense but George claims that's what Max said.

Unless Max explicitly confirms what George claims Max said I'm going to stick with George is lying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Now that is actually irrelevant information. Nothing I said refutes what you've said and it refutes nothing I've said. It's not even something I've overlooked because my example is built on the premise that the game is sold in both stores.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

I agree and another part that made me question what Russell claims is this:

"I was going to not even race you tomorrow, I was going to let you by".

Does that sound like Max Verstappen to you? It doesn't sound like Max Verstappen to me. GP literally felt the need to tell Max to not race and risk the WDC because Max is a racer first and foremost and he's not just going to give up a position. He's going to race and he's going to make you fight for your position and the only exception to that is if he has a really good reason to let you by (and even team orders isn't a good enough reason). Considering he's already won the WDC and there's nothing to gain (or lose) for the WCC Max was there to race last week, why would he ever choose to not race George and just let him pass? He wouldn't because that's not who Max Verstappen is. If he can race he will race.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I would imagine a successful getaway includes leaving as little evidence as possible. The more you jerk around leaving false evidence the more likely you are to also leave real evidence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

My guess is that if Perez is going at the end of the season the second seat goes to Yuki. Unless they buy out someone else (which I seriously doubt) there really aren't any other good options for RBR. Lawson isn't better than Yuki, Colapinto is off the table, Bottas has ruled out RBR and the rest are unlikely to be better than Perez. It's either Yuki or Perez.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

There are so many games that I don't even care about all the games available on Steam (that I'd be willing to play). We have so many games coming out that I'd have to play game for a living to play all the games I want to play, and even then I'm not 100% sure I'd be able to play everything I'd be open to play. I have multiple games that I've purchased and installed thinking "I'll get to them soon enough" and they're just taking drive space. I also have multiple games on my wishlist that are "waiting for a discount" but I'm probably never going to pick them up because actually they're waiting for my backlog to clear and it will never clear.

Does it suck that Alan Wake is Epic exclusive. Sure. Does it really matter to me? Not really because I'm oversaturated with games I want to play. Missing one great game doesn't matter when I already have a backlog of great games I won't purchase because I have a backlog of great games I've purchased that I won't play because I have a backlog of great games I really want to play.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You wanted to know why there aren't all time lows on other stores. You agree that the lower the price gets the more people are likely to purchase it. But then you think userbase is irrelevant?

Let's say there are 10 million gamers in the entire world, 90% use steam 10% use Epic. Not that it matters but I'll add it anyway to further prove the point, Epic takes 10% and Steam takes 30%. You make a game that 50% of all the gamers in the world want to buy at a certain price. Let's say you have no issues selling on Epic and you sell at full price ($60) to the 50% of Epic customers. You make $60 * 0.9 * 1 mil * 0.5 = $27 million. On Steam your game doesn't sell at all on full price but at 50% off all potential customers will buy the game. So with a 50% discount on Steam you will make $60 * 0.5 * 0.7 * 9 mil * 0.5 = $94.5 million.

You can literally have Steam take a bigger cut than Epic and sell the game for half a price and still make more money on Steam because the userbase plays a huge role in how much money you'll actually make. That is why you see all time lows on Steam, because you can sell your game for cheaper than any other store and still make more money on Steam.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

How much RAM do you imagine internet cafe machines use? 8gb? 16gb? 32gb?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

You can check yourself. I'm pretty sure the "cafe cards" amount to around 3-8% of the lowest end cards depending on whether we consider 1650 and 1060 as cafe cards. Obviously also excluding integrated cards because those I didn't consider in the first place. On the other hand the current gen and last gen low end cards (xx50 and xx60) make up 25-28% of the market.

Also I don't understand why you'd want to exclude cafe's from the potential market? It's not like internet cafes don't upgrade their hardware. When they do upgrade they're definitely going with the low end cards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

If the userbase is irrelevant then X per game is also irrelevant. X per game matters only in the context of how many sales you'll make. There's a strong correlation between sales and userbase because more users means more potential sales.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The only reason I'm thinking they're going with Yuki is because who else is there? Lawson and Colapinto look like they're going to bomb out like Gasly did. Bottas to my knowledge has said RBR doesn't want him. I love Ricciardo but he seemed as washed as Perez. Even if they bring Hadjar up to F1 there's no way he goes straight into RBR. Maybe Albon is up for grabs, but would he really want to drive the RBR again knowing he won't be confident in that car?

Yuki is far from the ideal pick, especially because he doesn't look like he's ready to be the number 2 driver, but the options are so limited that if they don't pick Yuki they might as well continue with Perez.

view more: ‹ prev next ›