How about you don't assume what I'm saying and you read what I'm actually saying. I never said you stated either of those things. I said if you can't tell the difference between the two statements it's pointless to explain how that meme is political.
If you think "I don't like tattoos on women" is the same as "women with tattoos look like vandalized buildings" then you're missing the nuances necessary to have this discussion.
And the meme completely breaks down if the building is considered art so let's not play dumb. We both know in this meme the building isn't representing art.
Even if it is a criticism of the tattooing style it's still likening it to vandalism. It doesn't change the message behind the meme.
Because it's essentially saying that her decision to get tattoos is the equivalent of her vandalizing her body. It's a meme criticizing a woman for choosing what she wants to do with her body, which is just a tamer version of "your body my choice".
Nuclear power has its own mining and rare material problems, in the form of uranium. You have to dig into the earth for it, and then after you use it, poison part of the planet forever. We still dont know what to do with all the nuclear waste we alrwady made.
Thorium is 3-4 times more abundant than uranium, is generally safer to use and would produce less waste that is also less radioactive and can become safe in a reasonable timeframe (few centuries compared to few hundred/thousand? centuries). Historically the main issue with Thorium has been that it's not as sexy as uranium because you can't make nuclear weapons out of thorium.
Just pointing out you're the one living in cuckoo land.
I guess next you're going to call AI generation fanfic.
From Gemini:
Is this manifesto political? (removed the manifesto to save space)
Yes, this manifesto has strong political undertones.
Here's why:
Focus on Systemic Issues: It criticizes the US healthcare system, the dominance of large corporations (like United), and the perceived corruption and greed within these entities. These are all significant political issues. Calls for Action: While the author doesn't explicitly advocate for violence, the act itself and the language used ("parasites," "brutal honesty") suggest a desire to disrupt the existing power structures. This implies a call for change, which is inherently political. Critique of Power Dynamics: The manifesto highlights the imbalance of power between corporations and the American public, arguing that the public has allowed this imbalance to persist. This analysis of power dynamics is central to political discourse.Disclaimer: This analysis does not condone the actions described in the manifesto.
Note: The indecipherable words make it difficult to fully understand the author's intended message.
Same question with chatGPT.
Yes, Luigi Mangione's manifesto contains political elements. It critiques systemic issues, such as the healthcare system in the United States, corporate power, and societal complacency. By highlighting the disparity between healthcare costs and life expectancy, as well as the influence of large corporations, the manifesto engages with political and economic structures.
However, the political nature of the document is more implicit than explicit—it critiques systemic issues but does not explicitly outline a political ideology or program. The tone also suggests a personal justification for extreme actions, which can blur the lines between political and personal motives.
It's sad when even a braindead AI is smarter than you.
I don't know what you're lacking to not understand his manifesto and I don't care because it's not my job to improve your failed education. I'm not wasting any more time on you.
You said intent not outcome. Him killing only one and it "not having any effect" is an outcome. His manifesto doesn't say he intended to kill only one, his intentions were against the system not a single individual.
Looking at the outcome and saying "that wasn't political" is like saying Jan 6 wasn't political because they failed to overthrow the government.
We have no indications that Luigi wanted anything other than one or maybe a handful more dead CEOs.
But why did he want one or more CEOs dead?
Are you saying it's okay to say you don't like black people? The color of your skin is as fundamental as your appearance can get and if there's nothing wrong with expressing dislike about certain appearances then surely there's nothing wrong with saying you don't like black people. Actually, let's not soften that statement. According to you there's nothing wrong with hating black people because it's just expressing a dislike. I could just as easily use that to say it's okay to hate women too. I could probably also fit jews, arabs and other ethnic groups (as long as they dress in a certain way)
And this is the issue with your opinion. It's so blunt and devoid on any nuance that it can be twisted to mean whatever it needs to mean at any given moment. So yeah, of course according to you it's not political. Nothing even remotely related to appearance is political.