Support an amazing "single-A" game that suffers none of the issues of modern enshittification by purchasing a physical copy.
OR
Refuse to hand any money to the mega corporation that shut down the studio responsible for the gem that is Hi-Fi Rush.
sweats nervously
The insanity and ignorance necessary to call prison "a sweet life".
What's the goal here? There's no way you're this willfully ignorant, right?
It's kind of like Kahoot, but there's a greater variety of games.
The teacher hosts a game with a question set they either found it made, and each student joins on a device. They're givegiven the questions and selecting correct answers earns them something relative to the game.
The most traditional one is the one that was described here, where they are given every question in sequence and are awarded points for the accuracy and speed of their answers, but there is some great variety. There's a tower defense game where correct answers give you the currency to buy and upgrade towers, a "survivors"-like game where a correct answer is required to be given a choice of weapon upgrades and several variants on slot machine-esque games, where correct answers gives them a random bonus ranging across gaining score, multiplying score or stealing score from other players.
I like to use it with the kids whenever I require some rote memorization. Ie, we're reviewing terms we've used or will be using in a unit, or we're refreshing things they're supposed to have learned in previous years.
There's some great single-player options too, if you ever find yourself struggling to deal with rote memorization for any courses you'd take as an adult, too. While it's definitely targeted towards classrooms and kids, the games are imo substantially more engaging ways to memorize things that are in general hard to care about outside of a requirement for some job, diploma or degree.
Damn, my grade 7 class is cringe af. Kid keeps naming himself "skibidisigma" every time we play Blooket.
The endgame Sephiroth fight was definitely forced. It reeked of "well, he's been the secret antagonist all game, so we can't just disclude him from the finale" kind of thinking.
I liked the more persistent villain lurking in Cloud's broken mind, but they shouldn't have felt the need to try and put a pseudo capstone on that story thread.
That's so fascinating, tbh. I mean, different strokes, so I can't judge, but it's the impressively deep strategy they've baked into Remake's combat that I am particularly impressed by. That said, it makes sense though that if you dislike Tales combat, you'd dislike Remake's combat. They're not the same persay, but they're cut from the same cloth imo.
I could also go for a "no capitalism" approach, but I'll take what I can get.
Calling the new game's combat "mind-numbing" compared to a random encounter turn-based system is both peak irony and peak rose-tinted glasses.
I can't get over just how much better Remake is compared to the original, so you do you, I guess. I was incredibly pleasantly surprised to see the ways they're engaging with telling a different story and taking the name "remake" very literally. I was seriously concerned they were just going to sell the original story again in three seperate parts as full-price titles.
I'd think, for someone who loves China so much, you'd understand the value of a social score telling you that you're doing a bad thing. Guess you only like to listen when that score is managed by a fascist regime.
Not as scary as the propaganda you're spreading with the original post.
Infinite growth is referred to as cancer. Your friend is obviously right that we cannot sustain infinite growth, but it's misguided to think that the only way out species can possibly survive to any length is by having more children and increasing our population year over year.
With improving technologies and automations, far less labour is required to achieve the same results. There is no reason we need an infinitely increasing population on our decidedly finite earth just to keep our species afloat. This would take a major restructuring of our social and economic systems to do correctly, otherwise we run the risk of centralized wealth mucking it all up, but the point remains that there's no necessity to continue reproducing at the rate we have been. This supposed "need" for labour is just capitalist propaganda perpetuating the idea that work is inherently good, all designed to fuel an inherently exploitative economy. Line must go up, otherwise how can the privledged few assure that their net worth continues to grow exponentially?