Glide

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Because a marginalized group has never been misled to accept and excuse abuse before. What a fuckin' take.

Not sure what you mean by my "own house." American white women are a demographic I'm displaced from in a number of ways.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

You quoted a bunch of stuff from the study like there's a problem with it. If you're going to attempt to dismiss the study as bullshit, you should probably try finding evidence of bullshit, rather than pointing and screaming, like we all understand whatever incredibly biased point it is you think you have.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Does this mean the algorithm was designed to push a republican agenda? Or does the algorithm know that liberals are more likely to watch videos from the opposing side than conservatives?

Both of these things can be true.

A friend of mine likes to say, a systems goal is what it does in practice, not its design intent.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Thanks, SatansMaggotyCumFart. Enlightening as always.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (5 children)

They are.

Marginalized groups can be more or less marginalized than others. That does not make them powerful relative to the rich-ass white men that run the world through financial influence alone.

Ya'll motherfuckers act like just cause women can vote now, sexism is "solved."

[–] [email protected] 107 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What the actual fuck is this treasonous, Anti-American propaganda popping up in my feed? The artist should be ashamed of herself for creating this, and OP is disgusting for sharing it around.

We all know Elon is the one pitching.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It absolutely was. This is more of a meme than a genuine reference to historical "gaming" as we mean the term today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (7 children)

I've also heard some "running it offline avoids all the Chinese biasing and spying" anecdotes. Though I haven't seen any first hand evidence of this. Needs testing, imo.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (4 children)

All allegations that the 2024 election was rigged are speculative, and there are no investigations examining the claims. The claims have not contested the election results as a whole.

Okay? Then fuck off with your clickbait fearmongering bullshit? Either there is evidence of ratfuckery, and investigations should already be underway, or there's not and they don't need to be.

Trump is literally building camps for out groups and disassembling the entire trade system that the US and its closest allies have depended on. We don't have time for this speculative "maybe" garbage. Get out there and do something, or stop wasting my time with speculation in the hopes that punchy headlines and ad engagement will save you for Der Fuhrer's concentration camps and total economic collapse.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago

I'm fucking so tired of reading the words "a gesture." We know what the fuck it is, and you do too you fucking cowards.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Missing Fern Gully, but a pretty good list nonetheless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Your best bet is to be in a lot of instances. My experiences so far is that basically any singular instance has its bias', and while some unapologetically ban users for disagreeing with them, the ones that don't still down vote for disagreeing with them.

While one of these forms of censorship is worse than the other, it's all censorship, and the only way to see a variety of views is to stay in the varying instances.

view more: ‹ prev next ›