GenEcon

The correct way to to cite it would be: 'OHCHR has confirmed the killings at Al Awdabuilding [...].'

Its simply wrong to not do it. Especially cutting of the sentence at a ','.

And the last time a crime against humanity was still under investigation – where it was obvious that a rocket hit a hospital, but the exact circumstances where still unclear – it was later confirmed that Hamas hit the hospital.

Maybe he should double check if the source he quotes is trustworthy. BTW: he hasn't corrected his made-up quote.

Killings are confirmed, but no one knows why and how.

The articles miss quoted then, and should therefore should be considered heavily biased.

Funny, how you alter the source to make it seem more clear than it is. So here is the part you altered, as reported by the OHCHR:

'OHCHR has confirmed the killings at Al Awdabuilding, although the details and circumstances of the killings are still under verification.'

Your rant is completely factless. Germany has called for a ceasefire numerous times. At the same time its urging to help civilians and open borders for humanitarian aid. Its calling for a two-state solution, where Palestinians have their own state.

The statement of 'unwavering support of Israel' regards to the existence or Israel, not everything Israel does. Because a lot of states and organizations want Israel to stop existing - for example Hamas.

So all antisemitism gets a pass now?

Yes.

Btw: why would you treat Russia different to Italy? If Italy commits human rights violation to the same degree as Russia and Israel do, I would expect you to condemn Italy and Peru the same way.