Flag

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

For shit thats coming out:

  • Baldur's Gate 3. Waoweee 22 years

For shit that isnt out:

  • Star Citizen... one of these days man :| yes i have an unrelated copium subscription @_
  • Command & Conquer 4. C&C3 was/is great, so it makes sense to get C&C4 eventually.
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Whats the source on this? If there is any

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Scorpion King.

Dumb fun and i love it.

Also as someone else said already, Equilibrium and Prince of Persia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One word: projection.

You didnt criticize for shit, just a meager and baseless accusation. Bye bye.

Also, to actually jump to using a wish for someone to get shot, either as suicide or by aomeone else, well there aremt that many other eays that tops that one in showing a frankly hillarious lack of a real point or argument.

Tl;dr: you suck at presenting an actual argument. Are you a genuine child, or a poorly educated adult?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Dishonest? Nice claim, care to back it up? If you can?

The standard is simple; provide something beyond a surface level claim. Or at least make an effort to make the claim seem reasonable. In this example, the original commenter you've jumped to defend portrays the dems as if its all their fault... but is it? As mentioned, there is the figurative elephant (gop) in the room, and all the shit they do, but ... No, the focus was on having selected biden. Not only that but also implying the blm marches were the root cause. But what about the reason for the marches? Or the actions by the elephant? Its not that the context doesnt exist just because, we all know it does. So, to then argue as if that context is gone... why should we take that as a serious and legit addition to the conversation, when its really not?

Its also amusing to see you call me/us "dishonest", as it seems to be the exact thing you are currently doing. Theres a word for this, and it is, besides being a tried and true tactic of the elephant: projection. Accusing others of what you yourself are or have been doing yourself.

So how about it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Did you expect the same acceptance for empty words and unfounded claims too? You dont have a base right to get a proper reply, you have to earn it by making a good point (thats worth debating) in the first place.

Here is a pointer to where you wemt wrong: painting a picture as if this is lets say the dem fault, rather than the rampaging elephant in the room, the gop. Its an old method of "arguing", and if you want to be taken seriously, should have picked a different tactic. But you didnt so... here we are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Bullshit.

Its russia that has escalated it, no, started -and- escalated it all. If you want the war to end, argue for the invader to fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Didnt she repeat the act afterwards tho? Outsode of the legal walls of congress?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Doesnt it mostly go to Africa etc?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Didnt he basically already do that, but the trumpsterfire declined?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Im sure you can come up with a plethora of reasons for why. Few if any of which are honna be a source of joy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Ey i was gonna say that! :D

view more: ‹ prev next ›