eh, it's mostly cringe when the take isn't stupid, so here I find it fine
But I get the hate
eh, it's mostly cringe when the take isn't stupid, so here I find it fine
But I get the hate
I personally like taking one or two days off randomly, but yea people should still have the option to take weeks as well to... well.. have a life outside of work
Why would it display the priced paid by the company like this, when it doesn't for other countries like France though? Seems weird
Unless USA companies don't pay taxes when paying a salary? But I don't really believe that
It’s not nearly as hard to host your own server (or pay for it to be hosted).
Do you really expect more than even 5% of all youtube channels to do it? You have high hopes.
compensates for by sharing the distribution effort between viewers
I believe it's done in a kinda P2P way? Didn't really check, but wouldn't that just not work with NAT internet connections, which many people have because that's just more secure this way? Also, bad for privacy.
Using a TURN server would also add huge costs so it's basically like hosting your own server
Nobody ever asks “who pays for the servers” when it comes to Matrix or XMPP
I don't so I wouldn't, but if I was, I would be wondering, as I always do. Anyways, I believe XMPP doesn't store stuff and only transmits, and Matrix doesn't store things forever (and doesn't store videos like YT), and the main instance is funded by donations, and smaller instances are just pretty small and have media wiped when needed
it benefits monopolists to imply that doing so is necessary
That's the POV of people in [email protected] or selfhosted. Most people can't be bothered with this shit and are pretty tech illiterate. Some don't want to waste even a minute. And that's the case of the very vast majority of people on the internet.
I meant good health, no (mental) illness, no medical treatment, already have somewhere to live...
Then it's not an alternative
If it pays "a good bit more per view" than YouTube when basically no one on YT pays and many users have adblockers, someone is getting ripped off here
Then at this point I start to wonder: why can't they take people in countries where the cost of living is cheaper? When you're funded by donations, this seems more logical
I feel like companies based in the USA and accepting donations make it so that donations from countries outside USA are a lot less meaningfull because we get less money, and they need to spend more.
So 170k$ isn’t that much
If that's the amount the company pays, then yea. If this is the amount the employee receives, then that's a lot. Like really.
what the employee pays
seems like there's a problem here?
Indeed, but it's understandably a super high amount compared to what we get. If you're in good shape, you get way more money. If not, you probably get (a lot) less.
Yellow ink used to draw those sweet invisible fingerprints on every printed page so you can be tracked easily