Fifrok

I remember hearing the officier in question 'thought it was a blutooth speaker' but it might have been just a rumor or I'm remembering wrong (I hope so atleast)

In Poland we can't even trust the police to be responsible for their own safety (a officer used a grande launcher in his office), or even the millitary to handle logistics (landmines got delivered to ikea)

nobody is gonna be reading all that lmao

1. Wasn't there one in New York just this week (and in diffrent states)?
2. This is a community about europe, why would you expect info about an anti trump rally in here?

After Germany invaded Poland they have continued to sit by and do about fuck all for a year.

But we do, in fact, have enough information to call Trump a fascist (and thus anyone who is a suporter of his). The defintion of fascism, as stated by wikipedia is:

• far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement.
• characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition
• belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race
• strong regimentation of society and the economy.
• Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism

Trump has, in the not so distant past:

• Claimed expanded executive authority
• refused to transfer power after losing an election
• has praised authoriterian leaders
• Frequently made appeals to racial and cultural superiority (e.g., calling certain countries “shitholes,” claiming immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of 'America')
• Attempted to delegitimize dissent or protest as unpatriotic
• Just a couple of days ago called the national guard (not sure if that's the correct translation) on anti-deportation protesters
• Has, and is, sending deported people into de-facto concentration camps
• Has suggested using the military for domestic policing
• Has endorsed populist economic nationalism (tariffs, breaking international trade norms, attacking corporations that oppose him)

And much more, but let's just jump to a conclusion anyways, right? Nazwałbym Pana debilem, ale tak nie wypada, to tego nie zrobę.

Yes, no genocide on homeground (unless you could count the genocide of native americans as still on going), but there's slavery (and it has a big enough market influence that it lowers wages significantly) and concentration camps.

OH! Finally! A chance to use my knowledge acquired from scrolling wikipedia while procrastinating! That law hasn't been overturned and is still, well, law. Of course every once in a while some clueless cop (because why should somebody enforcing the law, know the law sigh) will ask a topless sunbather to cover up. Here's the article.

Governments get to decide what speech is illegal these days, and do so to push their agenda.

That has always been the case, pick any time in any goverment and you will find that. That's just how goverments work.

things that the far left don’t like so call “far right hate speech” to censor it and push their desired narrative

Please, do tell, where is this place that has a 'far left' with enough power to that? Not germany, CDU is in power right now and they are center-right, left-wing (but not far-left) Die Linke has got around 8-9% of votes in the last election. There is not a single european country that has a far-left party in power. The biggest far-left organisation in my area is food-not-bombs (pl. jedzenie zamiast bomb) but I think they would have a hard time trying to censor anything, considering that the only thing they do is give meals for people in need.

I mean this with the biggest offence possible: AI judges make no sense, atleast with the current way of doing AI (LLMs). It's been known for years that they amplify any bias in their training data. You are black? Higher chance of going to prison and longer serving time. Getting divorced and are male? Your ass is NOT getting custody. Hell, even without that the LLM might just hallucinate some crime not in the data for a case and give you a life time prison sentence. And if you somehow manage to avoid all that, what's stopping somebody from just shadowprompting it and getting the judgement they want? It would also be an easy target for corruption, the goverment wants their poltical rivals gone? Tweak the model so it's just that bit harsher, or just a bit more alligned with some other interpretatnion of the law.

Who would even choose the training data? The judges? Why would they, it would be better for them to sabotage and keep their jobs. Some goverment agency then? Don't want to do that, or you're gonna find out separation of power has a reason.

Bad idea.

You really want to give any power over yourself and others to the bias amplification machine?

Works fine for me, might be something on your end