Fazoo

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

I love how there is always some dipshit lurking around here, stats at the ready, regardless of how relevant their outrage may be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (13 children)

For those that don't want to read far leftist media with anti American spin: https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/18/africa/niger-ecowas-d-day-military-intervention-intl-hnk/index.html

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

The CIA isn't all that bad. It's run by raccoons forming a shadow government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Once again proving your lack of comprehension. Well done, child.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is incredible how childish you've become after a simple failure on your part. Lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

So you post something irrelevant to the discussion and then get aggressive over being told so? Grow the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You were talking about them, but not in the context of the discussion, dumbass. Your reading comprehension needs a tune up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

None of which align with each other, hence my continued statement of reading from many sources, of varied bias and neutrality. At least I know who is running the show in these places, unlike the unknown outlets you dredge up from the backwaters of the Internet.

You seem to have a serious comprehension problem. Best of luck on your continued education.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Well established? Then why is it relatively unknown? It's barely searchable on any media bias metric, which is a bad start for it's overall out reach and popularity.

USA Today? Please. I'm talking about worldwide outlets of varying neutrality and bias. Reuters, Al Jazeera, Sky, BBC, and AP to name a few.

Check those out if you get tired of the echo chambers I'd expect to find in social media ads and poorly worded tweets. You're one step up from YouTube Shorts "news".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

There's the deflection. Classic.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I read several worldwide publications of varying neutrality and bias to piece together a comprehensive understanding of issues.

You continue to post publications I've never heard of and of varying leftist bias. I look them up each time. You should heed your own advice and try broadening your news beyond obscure outlets. If they source a well known outlet that backs up the claim, linking to them would offer you better credibility. Unfortunately that's not typical from my experience, reading these Facebook quality reports.

Justifying biased reading as "They haven't sold out" is akin to burying your head in the sand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

They always have, and there is an Orthodox unit with special rules. The community doesn't like it though. As for birth rate, that's strictly for the Secular side. Orthodox women are, to put it bluntly, giving birth as a job. This is part of the issue between them and the Secular Jews that fund their lifestyle. Who the hell wants to pay high taxes so someone else's family of 10 can live without working?

view more: ‹ prev next ›