False

The CGI elements stand out a lot and clash with the traditional animation - much moreso than I had remembered.

I thought this was great when I was 14 and saw it in the theatre. I rewatched it like 10 years ago and it has not held up well, at least in terms of visuals.

Debates over its failure range from the derivative PG-rated screenplay and bumpy development process, to its landing squarely in that netherworld of being ignored by older teens and adults and too mature and violent for small children, dropping it in that abyss between the two ticket-buying demographics.

Hmm, I guess I was right in the perfect demographic at the time then.

Who?

I don't know anyone that plays fighting games. Who keeps buying these?

That was a pretty solid RPG. The first expansion is exceptionally good.

They also have vertical walls instead of curved because maximizing interior space is more important than aerodynamics for them.

Oh? Whoops

Dragon Commander? It was aggressively okay

Edit: clicked the article, good guess me

Word docs are actually html under the hood. .docx is just an archive containing all the relevant files iirc

Seems like bad opsec.

That was my first thought. Is it 2008 again?

Bloom is used a lot subtly than it was in the 2000s. I think motion blur (and maybe depth of field) are the new bloom.

That's truly some advanced-level porn.