Like most things in biology, neurological disorders are on a spectrum. So the bystander who chimed in with their opinion should be taken with a grain or salt. It comes down to the patients neurobiology, care team, meds + the associated regiment, as well as their desire to treat the disorder. Neurbiology is a highly unique aspect of every human, so anothers experience with it will be pretty biased by default. I was in a long term relationship with someone who was bipolar, but the only reason we broke up was because we were in our mid twenties and had no real idea what we were doing. If your son wants to maintain his relationship with his partner, thats fully an option, it'll just come down to staying in front of it!
ExtravagantEnzyme
Even if the other forms of energy and matter from the supernova explosion were removed, the ultradense burst of neutrinos alone would literally vaporize someone from the inside in close proximity. While neutrinos are most often harmless, this is one of the few times they can be lethal. In a core-collapse supernova, roughly 99% of the energy is released as a burst of neutrinos, totaling about 10^53 ergs over 10 seconds. So the neutrino flux from the supernova would be so insane that enough neutrinos would collide with the atoms in your body to deposit lethal amounts of energy. This ultimately leads to one being vaporized from the inside!
You decide, here's the TL;DR:
- Google has confirmed to Android Authority that development of the Android operating system will soon fully happen in private.
- Currently, Google shares some of the work it does on the public AOSP Gerrit, but moving forward, this work will all be done in private.
- The goal for this privatization is to simplify Android OS development and not to hinder external developers, which is why Google remains committed to publishing source code to AOSP after each release.
Obligate link for Neil deGrasse Tyson's academic analysis of Terrence Howard's “research paper” he tried to publish: Invidious or YouTube. Neil gave him constructive criticism with the goal of helping him improve his understanding of science. Yet, that's not how he took it, and the content of the paper truly demonstrates how the field of science is FULLY not within Terrance's wheelhouse. His “understanding” of science should only be used to help others new to the field see the benefits and reasons for the scientific method.
The grammar and spell check is not an issue, but if you're using the rewritten alternatives for a sentence it's definitely a toss up. Granted, it just uses what you've written and provides a few different ways to relay the same info, but then again, it does this via AI. So really idk, but I've used LanguageTool rewrites on most of my college papers and I haven't had any issues. In the big picture, it's nothing close to using an LLM to write a paper.