You are obviously not educated on this.
It did not “learn” anymore than a downloaded video ran through a compression algorithm. Just: LoLz.
You are obviously not educated on this.
It did not “learn” anymore than a downloaded video ran through a compression algorithm. Just: LoLz.
You can digitize the books you own. You do not need a license for that. And of course you could put that digital format into a database. As databases are explicit exceptions from copyright law. If you want to go to the extreme: delete first copy. Then you have only in the database. However: AIs/LLMs are not based on data bases. But on neural networks. The original data gets lost when "learned".
Why would it be plagiarism if you use the knowledge you gain from a book?
I guess it is supposed to be a joke, or meme. But it is pretty unfunny. It is just stupid.
Same in Germany
They need them to breed the other terrorists they like to bomb.
The irony is, Zionists/Jews, Palestinians and Hamas: believe in the same God.
JIT compiling and byte code morphing and instrumentation. For instance data base persistence is usually done by instrumentation tools, that add instructions to keep track about transactions and modified objects, or new objects that need persisting. And endless more things.
Then it would not be constantly evolving with more than a new release per year. Do you know anything about gigantic Java ecosystem? Guessed so ...
The LLM is not repeating the same book. The owner of the LLM has the exact same rights to do with what his LLM is reading, as you have to do with what ever YOU are reading.
As long as it is not a verbatim recitation, it is completely okay.
According to story telling theory: there are only roughly 15 different story types anyway.