Inject bleach already bro.
EndRedStateSubsidies
joined 4 months ago
Bro... John Oliver is a comedian and doesn't consider himself a journalist: https://www.npr.org/2016/02/12/466569047/is-john-olivers-show-journalism-he-says-the-answer-is-simple-no
He's also not a billionaire nor own the show or the network it's on.
Like you're agreeing that the media outlet is under orders to shape the narrative... But then somehow take the individual journalists leaking things they were ordered not to as some perverse reason to still trust the outlet?
I'm not even sure what you're trying to say as your defense of the American press is a British comedian and an admission a billionaire shapes WaPo's narratives.
You are all over the map.
I have no issue with journalists, but you're not going to find them on an entertainment channel. The Washington Post was rubber stamping war profiteering before Bozos bought them.
The majority of outlets are owned by an ever concentrating number of billionaires. Blind trust is the last thing you want to give them.
If you need a tldr on a 5 minute read you opinion doesn't fucking matter.
Cells within cells.
Interlinked.
This post is unsettling. While LLMs definitely aren't reasoning entities, the point is absolutely bang on...
But at the same time feels like a comment from a bot.
Is this a bot?
Your first sentence suggests you only have a loose understanding as profit is revenue beyond all expenses including wages, rd, and reinvestment.
It's a pedantic but important difference as businesses regularly take on debt required to generate capital. Profit is also taxable while rd and infrastructure is usually deductible.
Don't stop at suppression when it was full manipulation.
Look at the scatter plots more closely.
Every dot (pair) is one precinct reporting.
Up and down is % of the vote.
Left to right is time in order of report.
Every dot is a unique data point. There should be no link in the results between precincts, right? Everyone should just be a total of votes for Trump or Harris.
That's exactly what was seen for the results of early voting ballots. Normal.
However, there's an obvious bias for Trump in the other reporting that increases in an obvious, consistent trend increasingly for Trump that's basically impossible to have organically.
Even if what you said were true, it couldn't account for the clean trend line working toward a goal.
The more densely populated an area is, the bluer it votes. The areas with the most people and lean blue should take longer to report. The smaller the precinct , the more red it usually goes but also faster to report. However, the most Trump leaning result came in last including large blue areas.
Analysing the data raises a lot of red flags that Democrats are all Helen Keller about.
Americans are dumb and have no attention span.
The American peasantry believe no shortage of absurdities because every media outlet they have is owned by a billionaire telling them how to feel about what they're allowed to know.
I'm sure they'll successfully take all the blame and fix nothing.