DrYes

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Did you like Foundation?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUYtDA7j19c

Pepper X: Sean Evans, Chili Klaus & Smokin' Ed Currie Eat the New World's Hottest Pepper | Hot Ones

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Wishful thinking headlines? I guess it's an opinion piece and I agree that it should be one of the top issues. Still this headline is utter bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Newsweek is not a credible source

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they probably have an understanding of physics we don't currently know about in the wider public.

I don't believe any secret agencies have a better understanding of fundamental physics. They have better technology and engineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

bro. nice avatar :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Guys, do we really need clickbait headlines from poor sources like politico?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

"They started hitting me first. So I hit back"

You:

First of all, I understand you think it’s okay to do, because you think it’s already being done by aggressors. But regardless of who started it, by saying it’s okay for self-defenders to do this you are also saying it’s okay for anyone else to do this. Because, if it’s a good thing to do, then it must be a good thing to do by someone you don’t like.

Your argument has no merit if this were an actual self-defense situation. Which Trump's followers believe it is. So you'd need to argue that it isn't a self-defense situation. Your argument wins no one over who needs to be won over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

This looks like a 15 year old game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNP4Sx3PtQI

This is a BF3 video from 12 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FktL2pu2wE

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So I read the article and the lawsuit has nothing to do with my question. It's more about precedent and actually finding out what the laws are if everything is as claimed.

Still think detectability is an interesting question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I didn't read the article but does it say anything about detectability? If I claim I created it who can prove an AI did?

view more: ‹ prev next ›