Dima

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's because no one had archived it yet, so I did, here's the direct link to the archive: https://archive.is/MgMu9

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Readeck also has a KOReader integration via OPDS catalogue

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

From what I've seen recently one of the things it did was use a fake email function they gave it to try to whistleblow to a government agency about issues with some medical testing or something

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Unlimited, but with reduced upload speed after 5TB. It's Jottacloud for €119 per year. I use it with rclone which lets me encrypt everything myself so I don't have to trust the provider.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'm surprised more of them didn't try to bring the canvas closer

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not though, if you're working in a restaurant/bar/shop and your boss tells you to give good service to everyone, especially (or in particular) Americans, then you're being told that it's more important that Americans get good service than other groups, even if you're supposed to provide good service to everyone.

The fact they may be a non-native speaker might mean that they intended "including" rather than "particularly", but it doesn't change the actual meaning of the words that they wrote.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, German policing of the situation has been pretty insane

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Not really, BLM was started to highlight issues of racism, discrimination, inequality etc. faced by black people.

I would not have had an issue if the mod had said equal rights for all people, including Jewish people. It's the fact that they say equal rights for all, but "in particular" one specific group that I take issue with, doesn't matter if that group is Jews, Christians, white people, black people, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

What I said here: https://feddit.uk/post/29329161/17366266

If we want equal rights for all (as we should) then that includes Jewish people, we don't then specify that one group "in particular" gets equal rights. I wouldn't have taken issue with the sentence if it simply said Jewish people included, because "all people" does indeed include Jewish people, but "in particular" is picking them out as special.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Why do they need to be specified? If it's equal rights for all people, then that includes Jews. There is no need to specify if you are promoting equality for all.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (21 children)
  • Calling for the dissolution of Israel, or calling for a one-state solution without specifying equal rights for all people; Jewish in particular.

All people are equal, but some are more equal than others

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're referring to the title, the community rule is that all posts need to be titled "PIC"

9
PIC (feddit.uk)
 
25
PIC (files.catbox.moe)
 
39
PIC (feddit.uk)
 
view more: next ›