Daxter101

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

~~Lord Uncle Zeus getting it on with ALL his nieces~~

No wait, I miscalculated, those are cousins

Edit: except Maia, that's a niece... I think. This layout is confusing

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

We don't live in a society that "can't meet our basic needs". We live in a society that actively prevents us from meeting them ourselves, by taking away the time and freedom necessary for us to grow into being capable.

No one having kids is the only actual concern of theirs, mental illness is a feature.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

But you might also be a sweeter

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I love the Figure 1 description.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

I don't know if it would be funnier if you pulled all this out of your ass for the joke, or if it was all real.

On one hand, an elaborate troll.

On the other, a scientifically well-learned polyglot cattle-farmer from Nepal with an unreliable memory and a penchant for pedantry.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Whoah. This is an interesting reinterpretation of the word "without".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Easy and quick, and we're a quarter of the way there, as of this comment

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

I don't know about proud, but you sure should be content.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Just as a sanity check for you, I think you're right about the people who choose to post on this thread.

"Something someone can't do", is a subset of "job", because a "job" literally is something you get money for, because other people don't wanna do it for some reason.

But the antiwork community is not here, and to be honest, your user of the word "type" in "only one type of job", muddles the meaning of the sentence a bit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is, no joke, exactly how the argument went, in my head. And the stick won.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not very knowledgeable on all this, but, the best method is to one day get laser.

That's probably not within your reach if you're asking so, let me say, from my experience with really visible, high contrast and dense body hair, any method of uprooting (plucking or waxing), both gives a pretty good result of hairlessness if you get all of them, and, after 2-3 cycles of growing and uprooting again, that hair is permanently 10-15% less visible (primarily thinner, also straighter). If you know where to look, my arm hair has a transition line between the side I plucked, and the side I haven't yet. It's unassuming, but still there, after plucking them 3 times, more than 4 months ago.

The disadvantage of that is that you need to let them grow a bit, in order to have something to grab on to.

view more: ‹ prev next ›