Why not both tho
And Freddie clearly agreed with the sentiment too
Why not both tho
And Freddie clearly agreed with the sentiment too
Your astroturfing reads so strongly like sarcasm I almost upvoted.
I honestly thought "There's no way anyone, paid or brainwashed, would post such a thing and mean it".
What makes this thing you're describing, not anarchism?
I think you're thinking of anarchocommunism specifically. Which is "not all communism"(tm).
State-based communism is a thing, that many people usually called tankies by others, do believe in.
I'm assuming they meant "talking to the parent, using less complicated, more mainstream words, even if the meaning is a little wrong as a result".
Which in my opinion is an ok approach, even though this specific parent, just by posting here, appears tech- and lgbt- savvy enough to probably know at least some terms.
~~Also, they could have just said 'not trans' instead, if 'cis' would be too advanced.~~
Actually scratch that, I get using "straight" as non-lgbt. It is how is very commonly used outside of lgbt circles.
But not a bad thought on its own. ~~just maybe a bit othering.~~
I mean... Understandable. I get it.
I mean, nearly all of them do, tbh. Especially the last one.
The breeding kink option
uBlock Origin -Iceberg edition-
Ado rules
jpg go boo
Yep, this is the feeling
I see. Well, if I take what you're saying as fully correct, then it sounds like communism compared to anarchism, is just "a different path for how we reach the same utopia".
And this different path passes through more authority (quantity and quality), through the existence and emphasis of the state.
How much authority, is probably what makes the spectrum of Anarchy to Stalin-Lenin.
And well... As an anarchist, deafboy's comment might be polemic, but I get it. Any authority that can, will get corrupted.