It is not an 'intensifier', it is just obnoxious. The purpose is not to enhance any meaning, but to 'dominate' over the reader. The word is used in an 'adversarial' context - an insult and a challenge to the reader. It is symbolic of the general anger that we see so commonly today, and I submit it is a direct cause if that anger. The demise of American civilility is completely mapped on to the curve for the use of these obnoxious, angry, combative vulgar terms in the common vernacular.
Daryl
Let's do what it takes, and certainly do not let America dictate our trade policies.
Apparently there is no such prohibition in Canada. Even leaders are free to worship according to their faith.
I matters a lot if he lets his religious views interfere with his political duties. During the last elelction, the Catholic Bishops made a point of commanding all Catholics to vote for a candidate that would push for Catholic theology to dictate policy.
Carney attended the inaugural mass for the new ope after he started office. He did so as a Catholic, not as a PM.
This very blatantly has no connection to Canada. It is posted in the wrong community.
Interesting. Can the Canadian Conservative Party investigate a worker in an American republican bot farm?
Interesting. Do Chatbots do sarcasm? The Turing Test?
Actually, you can. Or at least I can.
Of course, a Chatbot probably would not know this.
The wandering chain in this discourse makes me want to think 'AI Chatbot'.
The Easter coast of Canada is closer to Britain than Britain is to the furthest east point of the EU.