Cypher

joined 2 years ago
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Your high school started at what time?

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 139 points 2 years ago (15 children)

MTG is known for her extra-marital affairs which got her divorced.

It’s literally always projection with these losers.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago

This is how Sony won this generation by a landslide.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There’s just no soul to the game, I’m the same as you, and it really disappointed me.

It’s the last Blizzard game I will ever buy.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I was looking forward to playing Elite with PS VR2 but they don’t bother supporting it, and I couldn’t even get the account sync to work.

It’s the one game I have refunded on PS5.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Legislating the Voice is of course an option and something the government has committed to doing if the referendum is successful.

You should contact the ABC and provide them with a correction.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-27/you-ask-we-answer-why-cant-voice-to-parliament-be-legislated/102879806

The government would prefer to take the concept of a Voice and constitutional recognition for First Nations people to a referendum and have the actual machinery of the body put forward in legislation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-10/how-voice-to-parliament-could-work/101749746

If the referendum passes:

  1. Consultation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, the Parliament and the broader public to design the Voice
  1. Introduce a Voice establishment bill into the Parliament
  1. Once Parliament approves the legislation to establish the Voice, the legislation comes into effect and the work to set up the Voice begins.

https://voice.gov.au/resources/fact-sheet-referendum-question-and-constitutional-amendment

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago

There was literally no downside for ATSI communities to vote yes.

Additional representation with no limitations on existing avenues of representation? Who wouldn't sign up... assuming you're included.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You are correct, I will leave my post as is though.

(To avoid confusion or making your comment seem irrelevant)

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 13 points 2 years ago

I mean…. Given that fusion is the combining of atomic nuclei it is kind of compression of matter into denser atoms.

It’s a very crude but surprisingly accurate description.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You claimed the legislation had been shown, it has not.

Your misinformation helps no one.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Australians do not vote for a Prime Minister, we vote for a political party which nominates its Prime Minister in the event of an election victory.

By convention parties nominate the PM before and promote them during the campaign. PMs can however be chucked out by their own party without a vote by the public, as happened with Kevin Rudd.

PMs do not simply have a carte blanche “mandate” to implement their election promises and must follow all parliamentary process.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Design principles are not legislation, it seems you are unfamiliar with Parliamentary process.

Additionally he (Anthony Albanese) stated that if the referendum is successful, another process would be established to work on the final design, with a subsequent government produced information pamphlet stating that this process would involve Indigenous Australian communities, the Parliament and the broader community, with any legislation going through normal parliamentary scrutiny procedures.

The final design being the legislation.

I hope that clears things up for you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›