CooperRedArmyDog

That does not change its nationalism, and reaking of american exceptionalism

I only brought it up because I know in the US marrage laws are often the same or lower than out age of consent laws (from wikipedia) so I think the marrage laws are more damning, atleast in the US

Lets not forget, the USA has been at war for BY FAR the majority of its life, I think but dont quote me on this the US has only been at peace for 2 years

Look it has to be the US, the US is the only nation who has shown themselves to be untrustable with nuclear wepons, not only being the only nation to drop them and have them detonate in a war, but also during the cold war accidentaly dropping them all over and by some stroke of luck while merphy was sleeping none of them went off even when the safties where not engaged.

Democratic, when the leader did not get the majority of elegable votes. DEMOCRACY when studies show the government action has 0 corilation to the popular will ... wow much democracy

Odd that your solution to criticism of place they (might) live is move to another place. I mean that kind of head in the sand thinking and blind naitonalism has never gone wrong ever

One nitpick on your post, you posted the age of concent not the age of allowable marrage, in in some places those are diffrent numbers

This from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States shows the earliest allowable marrage age in each state, and I promise you California's age of concent is greater than 0

I have never seen evidence that women are not allowed to drive, and I have had Iranians tell me the contrary. IRNA Irans state news if it was not down from likely DDOS I would show you posted an immage of one of the dead from Israels attack, was a women without a head covering, agian there is no evidence I can find that it is a law, just a large cultural preference. Same think with a women in Iran being dependent on a man, I have seen no evidence for this outside of the Western press.

I just want to ask a clarification, are you saying anti-child marriage is a bad thing???

I mean it seems like you do not understand the rule that keeps getting cited, the reason russian gets removed when used as an insult is often times it is used in a racist or atleast racist adjacent way, and so the way .ml has decided to deal with that is that it just, isnt an insult, that is not that you can never critisize the russian federation ever, but you cannot use russian as an insult, because agian it is often used racistly or atleast racist adjacent.

Edit: If you would like proof I am more than happy if asked to levy a critisism of the Russian Federation and then you can report it and we will see if it gets taken down

I am saying if you look at a genocide, and you cannot go "wow, thats awful, the people doing that are the baddies" I don't really trust you.

What I am saying is that he has had opertunities, even been asked if he would and he refuses, his scilence is astonishingly loud.

Also what I am saying, and I cannot stress this enough, is that this is the same level of evidence he uses to crusify .ml and the grad, not every time but a good portion of the time

I mean first if you dont critisize a genocide I have questions, Second that is his standard of evidence, he has used that same line on lessor things

So your evidence for supression and disinformation is 1) there are some people who post things you dont like and it hurts your feelings, and 2) a right winger with a grudge? I mean ... you do you man but I am going to judge you for it