Going to post this as a main comment but two things are true
Hire clowns, get a circus
Y'all need to actually read the article instead of just using it to prove what you already believe. The world is more complicated than a headline
It's a joy to watch you work in real time, keep it up
For clarity, this means the stock is back to the price it was in September. I know car-man-bad but I get tired of these sensationalized articles that are only shared because they confirm that someone we like is bad actually
To add to this, the ask isn't to build more apartments, the ask is to LET US
Single Family Zoning makes higher density housing illegal. If there are people who WANT to live in apartments they don't have that freedom because it's illegal in so much of the US.
No one wants to force you to live in an apartment, we just want to be able to choose to if we want to. let the market decide if we want houses or apartments
I think you haven't read the article
Both women literally already got their cars back
They're suing because the process was, as another commenter said, a huge pain in the ass
“Culley and Sutton’s argument for a separate preliminary hearing appears in many respects to be a backdoor argument for a more timely hearing so that a property owner with a good defense against forfeiture can recover her property more quickly,” he wrote. “But the court’s precedents already require a timely hearing.”
Alabama has since amended its forfeiture law to allow owners of seized property to request expedited hearings.
“Our decision today does not preclude those legislatively prescribed innovations,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote. “Rather, our decision simply addresses the base-line protection of the due process clause.”
Seems like it's less about civil forfeiture and more about how quickly can they get their property back when civil forfeiture happens
I think it's fine as it is. It's trading funny for poignanncy
