CharmingOwl

The Flowermaker is said to be a transgender man, consistently in every mythology that speaks about him. The gods obviously do not take hormones and can appear in whatever kind of form they want, which also makes this identification quite interesting. The Flowermaker tells me the reason for this is that flowers have ovaries as well as a stamen which is the male part of a flower. Research confirms this.

When the first lotus was put down by Hechun in the city of Puri, it actually took on the form of a male flower, but the Flowermaker was misgendered by the other gods due to their associations of flowers with femininity as well as his genitals. He cut his hair, wore men’s clothing, and wore a tight cloth around his chest to appear in a way that was comfortable to him, but he was still annoyed by the pronouns and assumptions the other gods made about him. He petitioned the king of heaven to legally change his gender in the celestial bureaucracy, to which he was surprised as he never anticipated such a situation. He legally changed the Flowermaker’s documents to acknowledge him as a male and granted him a potion that would allow his ovaries to produce masculine energy, and this was satisfactory for The Flowermaker, who needed ovaries to produce the seeds of flowers as well as perform certain rituals.

The Flowermaker also consistently reads as masculine during spiritual workings. His energy is unmistakably masculine and he is always blonde and wearing fishnets, usually with exotic colored eyes. He is also smoking from a cigarette holder. He is also exclusively young, but how young is a variation. In some cases he can appear as young as 12 or 13, but he is never older than 21 visually unless this reflects the preference of the magician conjuring him, but the older appearance does not truly reflect him. He can grant the magician aid in understanding gender, transitioning, or finding connections and friends in the LGBT community. He also grants meetings of all kinds with attractive men.

Los Satanistas del tiempo moderno son mayoritariamente ateístas, y no bregan con temas ocultas como veneración de Lucifer o trabajo con guías infernales. Por esa razón, se confunden cuando les digo que técnicamente, Lucifer es un dios del sol. Lucifer era una guía espiritual en tiempo romano y un símbolo del imperio llamado Sol Invictus, y cuando Cristianos empezaron a controlar el imperio Romano, lo cambiaron a un demonio. Por esa razón Lucifer puede ser relacionado con el sol, y su nombre literalmente quiere decir “quien trae la luz.”

The Satanists of the modern times are mostly Atheists, and they don’t work with the occult or veneration of Lucifer. For this reason, people get confused when I tell them that Lucifer is technically a sun god. Lucifer was a spirit guide during Roman times and a symbol of the empire by the name Sol Invictus, and when Christians started controlling the Roman empire they changed him into a demon. For that reason Lucifer can be related with the sun, and his name literally means “the light bringer.”

I don’t know who needs to hear this, but refusing to support the self-determination or validity of a nation because they are socially conservative is liberal imperialist logic. That does not mean you need to be a Russia fanboy or cheer on the actions of Saudi Arabia’s government, but it means that you understand that society will achieve social progress and progress beyond primitive ideologies when the level of development in that society reaches a similar state as the western world. The tribalism that we see across the entire world is due to underdevelopment and primitiveness as well as influence from reactionary organizations such as churches and extremist think tanks such as PragerU or Victims Of Communism which are supportive of western imperialism and rightism. We can even see great correlation in rightism and underdevelopment here in the United States, where the rural and less prosperous regions tend to be the most socially conservative. This explanation does not excuse racism or participation in hate groups, but it helps us to explain why a person with no education and financial insecurity would externalize their problems towards some demographic which does not even have real control of their society. We may hear someone complain they can’t get into college or work because of affirmative action, but this is an example of tribal thinking resulting from poor infrastructure in the educational system.

When we understand rightist groups indoctrinate and recruit from underdeveloped societies, this contextualizes a lot of rightism we see in the third world and why so many people tend to end up in theocratic or oppressive societies despite being on the receiving end of imperialism. Despite liberals in the US supporting invasions and bombings on the world in the name of social liberal ideology, that’s actually the worst thing they can do because it prevents the development of the society and their eventual transition into free societies. If the United States and Europe magically disappeared, what would happen to Afghanistan if left alone for a couple hundred years? What would true Korea look like if world peace was maintained and there stopped being a need to defend their nation from the American imperialists? Maybe instead of having their progress reset by drones and bombs they could actually achieve the material conditions that allow them to progress into a democratic socialist society. Oh, wait. I think that may be what the ruling classes of imperialist regimes do not want and the reason they use liberal ideas to support their actions.

The regime is not shy about using social liberal ideas such as LGBT rights or feminism to infiltrate and sabotage foreign governments. They have done so much harm to the movement by promoting LGBT membership in their genocidal military or trying to use gay reactionaries to infiltrate governments and promote liberalism. (I’m tempted to ask how someone can be a liberal and support America in a free country like Vietnam but that’s beside the point.) Imperialist states use the logic of their country being more progressive and socially advanced to justify these invasions which is a cycle that stops the entire world from improving, and even has detrimental effects on the citizenry of imperialist states since they do not benefit from this warfare, only a small elite do. Other pro-imperialist logic is even worse such as American exceptionalism or theological justifications for war as seen in Israel and Imperial Japan. This logic we see liberals putting out that being more socially liberal than another group justifies war historically has been used against Native people to take their land and could literally be used right now to continue taking their land as the government is doing. As a member of multiple minority groups, I ask that you do not use social liberalism to be a pretext for supporting western imperialism.

As revolutionaries, I’m sure we have all experienced times when our organizations are infiltrated by reactionaries or other unsavory people and/or those whose membership does not have a positive net contribution to the goals and/or aspirations of the organization. Here are five signs that the time has come for you to conduct purges of your group’s members.

The first and most obvious sign is constant arguments and distractions from the topic at hand. A member who tries to confuse every debate or steer every discussion off topic is not better than an infiltrator working for the CIA. This is a common infiltration tactic as well as used to neutralize revolutionary organizations, so regardless of whether the person is genuine or not, this behavior is disruptive and should result in a purge if it stops the group from being conducive to its purpose. If there are many people involved, you will need to create a list of names before purging them all in order to be thorough.

The second sign is adventurism and/or entrapment by authorities. They may be technically two different things, but the end result is the same of encouraging activities that go against established principles and/or endanger the members of the organization by creating legal precedents for the members to be detained by authorities. When you get that one member who openly talks about making bombs or encourages violence for some incomprehensible reason, they are either not mentally sound or want to encourage something to be done that authorities could then use to crack down on your organization. These are usually easy to spot because their suggestions are things that would rarely ever gain support of the masses, and would even subvert the goals of socialism if attempted.

The third sign is general ideological incompatibility that cannot be reconciled. Someone that incorrectly applies the ideology one or two times is not likely to fall into this category, but some statements prompt swift action. Real examples I have experienced are statements such as “Israel is holy to me” “Japan was liberating East Asia” or “Mussolini was the man”. Anyone who says something like this is painting a target on their forehead to be purged. Make sure to ask them questions to allow them to further incriminate themselves in front of the comrades.

Regardless of whether communications are conducted in person, online, or other platforms, you should purge members exhibiting this behavior and prevent them from sabotaging the movement from the inside. Failure to do this will allow a communist cell to be hijacked by reactionaries such as the CIA , Zionists, or other right-wing extremist groups and their sympathizers.

After the creation of the world and during the times when humanity was in a primitive state, they only had natural herbs and magic rituals to deal with their medical ailments. One day, an old and decrepit man approached the flowermaker and said “Oh Flowermaker, I am suffering from back pain, I have fallen and I can’t get up!” He came down to the world and picked the pods of poppies, extracted a white liquid from them and took it through a primitive process of opiate extraction before giving the man a tincture. He was free of pain, but the Flowermaker warned him of addiction and dependence if the medicine of poppies was abused. The man showed humanity how to make opium, where it was used in medicine for decades until its abuse became rampant.

The British Empire started using Opium for money, and promoting its abuse in Asia where millions died from the plant. Other similar places such as the modern United States also had pharmaceutical companies that caused addiction to concentrated opiates prescribed for pain in various medications. These medicines were abused, snorted, and prescribed in higher and higher doses until humanity suffered from addictions. From this point on, the gods were hesitant to give any more medicines to humanity if they had potential for addiction.

Some of you may have ancestors from Europe, so it is not a stretch to think Latin is beneficial to you for spells, rituals, or generally connecting with the lost heritage. All of the advice that normally applies to learning languages is not applicable to Latin, which fell out of use over a thousand years ago. For this reason, the best methods that exist for learning the language tend to be unconventional.

If you are a complete beginner and do not have a background speaking Spanish, Portuguese, or any other similar language such as French, you can begin by watching youtube videos that exist on the language for basic vocabulary. Italian is the most similar to classical Latin so that can be studied as a bridge to learning Latin and it has more existing resources such as television and music. However it should be noted classical Latin has a completely different grammar to how we normally speak today.

You will probably end up learning Latin through google translate which has its problems, but can immerse you in the language as you browse the web like you normally would. You have to listen to audio eventually so you know how to pronounce words, but once you are able to read and understand a good amount of things, it makes things a lot easier. Translate pages you are familiar with, the marxist internet archive, or any webpage where you already know what it says. You might learn a form of bastardized Latin, but it’s not like anybody is alive who speaks the language natively to correct you.

I’ve heard before that The United States could never be socialist because “Those countries are homogeneous.” I don’t think those people are actually thinking that socialism has to be ethnonationalist and in reality Korea is the only homogeneous socialist state, with the other four having large ethnic diversity (Though with high levels of respect for minorities that we do not see in the west) and with Cuba being a colonial country like America with the native population not even being the majority. So how can it be that the average person associates socialism with homogeneity and conformity?

It’s individualism. The answer is that Individualist philosophies and attitudes dominate the United States. This creates a vicious cycle where nobody can support themselves let alone help someone else, and the bourgeoisie find ways to put the masses against each other through economic, social, or other ways that undermine the ability of people to function as a society. Unpopular or oppressive regimes also promote this behavior and attitude because individuals are less able to free themselves than collective groups of people with coherent ideologies.

Anarchism is a contentious ideology within the communist movement. It’s not because they are reactionary or do anything necessarily bad, but the individualist attitude that caused people to go down the path of anarchy as opposed to socialism. The idea that all power needs to be resisted assumes that the individuals cannot come together to ever create a collective that is fair, just, and upholds their interests. Society is like a castle, with certain oppressed people forced to live in dungeons, others forced to farm or be peasants of the castle while the billionaires of the world have miles of luxurious rooms to themselves, and safe places to hide during wars or storms. While communists would argue that we need to work together to take over the castle, anarchists opposing all kinds of power is like destroying the castle under the assumption that the people can never be in control of it. Obviously these ideologies will appease some dissidents but never result in a complete overthrow that would actually endanger and strike fear into the hearts of the bourgeois class.

However you define society, whether it is a country, nation, or even a group of people living together, individualism is the death of it. Humans are social beings and these paradoxical individualistic societies (Since the whole idea of countries or societies are collective in nature) just makes you support a government without it benefiting the members of the society. It just exists for the upper classes to exploit human labor. This kind of regime survives in various ways which you may have seen yourself such as mental manipulation of people, indoctrination, and physical force to protesters. The United States seems to have very little difference economically from feudalism, or even pyramid schemes.