From what has been seen so far, at least the comments are back, not sure if the username still shows, but even if you editted the comment, they can be rolled back
Celivalg
joined 2 years ago
Well, you could stay private and continue to moderate as if it would always be a private sub, just have a few authorized users and a few posts a day to moderate...
Very nice prose btw, enjoyed reading
And yeah this sucks, my coffee maker has a 60 second boot sequence... Now I once suspeced it was heating up, but I don't think that's actually the case (found one that heated up in less than 10 seconds), more like someone decided to put an OS to manage the 8 touch buttons, pump, grinder and heater... Now appart from the boot sequence, it's nice...
But microwaves.... What does fish mean?
Nah, de-federation means they won't be seeing anything from lemmy.world on:
- local posts
- lemmy.world posts
They will still see lemmy.world comments on other instances, but lemmy.world posts won't appear on the ALL sorting.
In the same way lemmy.world won't be able to see beehaw posts.
Basically,
- local only concerns posts that have been submitted on beehaw communities
- All concerns posts submitted on any instance that is federated and to which at least one user on the instance is subbed to.
"Bringing out the best of bing to the chatGPT experience"...
LMAO
If you remove the comments deemed not anarchical enough, yes
As in pieces around them get buffed or they do more AoE damage?
AoE dmg knight is better tbh, this way when the knights come in flying over your head, they can do an anime style landing by imposing themselves on the ground at high speed, damaging surrounding pieces.
I would do that if there was a way to preserve the original comment, like a tool that just appends a statement at the end of the comment or beginning. I did answer a few support questions and I don't want to subject people to deleted answers
Ah, they restrict this in the extension store? That's.. shady
- blocking instances: There is an issue on github, https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397
- privacy: yeah that's one downside, can't argue with that
- migrating: a few issues on github
It mostly comes because a linux system is essentially a collection of much smaller programs that do one simple thing each, and each of those programs has alternatives.
So doing a gui for one program would allow you to control that one and not the others, and if you were using an alternative, you wouldn't have that gui.
Now trying to make a gui that agglomerates the most common ones has been done for userspace, mostly on specific distros... but when it comes to administering systems... it's a different story.
services, dns, ntp, boot, wm, lm, firewall, dhcp... all of these have important things to touch, but also have different programs that implement them.
Most authors of these programs don't bother with gui, mostly because it's quite some work, but also because it's not their problem. UNIX philosophy is very much do one single thing and do it well.. and when you can do a simple CLI that allows users and PROGRAMS to communicate with your program, why bother with GUI if it only accommodates one part of that equation?
Devs don't bother with GUI not because they think it'll be useless, but because it's a lot of extra work for something that ultimately will be less reliable than CLI...
One reason why linux is so good at doing servers is that no system software needs a GUI to work. Windows server has a headless version, but look how many applications are just unable to run on it as they all rely on GUI...
So in a way, having CLI first and GUI second is a blessing, even if it makes the first approach more difficult for users.
This is so fucked up,
They are gonna get sued to the ground