But_Class_War

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago

Fixed that second panel because there isn't even a pretense of respect

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yeah but also let's not forget that the DNC has funded far right extremest candidates in the past thinking that they could get an easy win. that didn't pan out

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yep, did a full rewatch last year and nothing against the James but that felt so forced. Nog moving in and those two doing an odd couple / romantic friendship thing was pretty decent though, but that's about it. Wish they'd given him a better intro instead of forcing a character out of nowhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I read somewhere they were working on dos3 and put it on hold when bg3 came up. If they go back and work on the dos series I'll be there for it!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I guess it wasn't coerced but "voluntarily" is quite the stretch, call this shi reed richards

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yep, better disclaimers are inevitable. When they call it a 'feature' it isn't getting fixed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fully agree and I wish the situation was better. I'll keep it on the level, genocide is a deal-breaker for me. I'm surprised it's not a deal breaker for other people too to be honest. And it's awful that our only choices are awful candidates. Really makes you wonder how we got here and I can't help but feel that this a vote blue no matter who bullshit along with Dems always backing incumbents Even when they're terrible has paved the way for our present situation. That's not going to get better unless we do something to change it. We found ourselves in afucked up hole and the first step to finding a way out is to stop digging.

I hope you're right though I guess there's a lot of people that are going to vote for him even though he is enabling genocide, I hope he decides to turn it around and start representing voters.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And you get to order someone shot in the foot (but let's be real, they're going to end up shot in the face regardless face) so congrats on giving the order too I guess

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The whole point is saying I'd rather not get shot at all and I'm not going to give any approval to get shot anywhere. Especially when the question is actually closer to where would I like to shoot some random civilian. I'm not going to give approval to shoot them in the foot nor the face.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

my genocider is better than ~~your~~ the other genocider, so much so that I'll give my active and explicit support to my genocider

k

 

Interesting read on economics, commodification, and search results gradually getting worse

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/511069

When I think about how the old, good internet turned into the enshitternet, I imagine a series of small compromises, each seemingly reasonable at the time, each contributing to a cultural norm of making good things worse, and worse, and worse.

 

In honor of the series finale of Riverdale we made up a cocktail to represent important parts of the show! Wish I'd taken a better photo but the cocktail was great!

  • 1oz/part rum (reppin V and Cheryl’s ‘Maple Run’)
  • 1oz/part campari (all the redheads (Andrews & Blossoms), and extended family (Coopers))
  • 1oz/part vanilla maple syrup (Sticky Maples and the maple groves)
  • Juice of 2 small limes, probably 1oz (no representation here, just for a balanced cocktail)
  • Thin lime twists for garnish (“South Side Serpents” Toni, Jug, Fangs)

Mix ingredients, shake with ice, serve in and call drinking partner Nick and Nora (Jug & Tabitha!)

view more: next ›