Maybe look into where they get their funding. Follow the money to the truth, just expect to be disgusted when you find it. On a related note, go back and watch HBO's the Wire to see why real systemic change doesn't happen.
Binturong
Odds that Ted Gill, Charlie Cleveland, and Max McGuire, previous leadership at Krafton saw that well earned bonus and just thought, "yoink"?
Fuck you and the trend you crawled in on.
You realize that you too have a choice and say in this, right? It actually doesn't even matter if he's 'playing' you or just ignorant of his own feelings, it seems to me that you're getting very little out of it aside from distress and confusion and hurt. If he doesn't know, you should: Why are you staying with someone who isn't even sure they want to be with you? It's the actual bare minimum to ask. I'd argue that you're already not dating if he's sitting on the fence like this, and I hope he hurts his little balls about it.
So they're really gonna write up that whole article and NOT include the actual list, huh? Embarrassing.
Yaccity Yacc, don't come back...
This just sounds like sour grapes whining paid for by Epic games who actually just want that to be them rather than Steam, despite Steam having provided the same service for free, consistently, for multiple decades now. The real offense here is PC Gamer attacking its primary consumer base (try to tell me the majority of PC gamers aren't Steam users), so you KNOW Epic is paying a shit-ton for this manufactured consent and wish-casting. Counterpoint to this article: having more games that you want to play than you have time for, without breaking the bank, is GOOD actually, and other launch platforms only seek to enshittify YOUR experience for their own gain. Thanks!
Edit: grammar
That's more than fair to say.
drawn out fart noises
It wouldn't matter if they did or not, we all know what they're there to do and that is deserving of condemnation and ridicule at the bare minimum. If you willingly work for ICE you don't get to clutch pearls when the communities you terrorize respond rationally in self defense.
Is this meant to suggest that hurtful words are worse than actual physical violence using 'less than lethal' weapons that routinely maim and permanently upend American lives? Or is it just an accident resulting from journalistic malpractice? Is there a difference?
I love (/s) the bad faith application of verbiage here, like you hurl the word poopybutt with your arm and it obliterated the face of the harmless masked abductor waving their GUN at you... This could be a dark Onion article, and I thought commondreams was worth a bit more. Consider my mind changed.
Actually it's capital. But it's true that Liberalism is the wiggly fun-house slide to capitalism and fascism no doubt.