BigBoopPaul

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

His successor wasn't deigned by bloodline.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

The power struggles within the dynasty have been violent, with Kim Jong-il's brother-in-law Jang Song-thaek, and Kim Jong-un's half-brother, Kim Jong-nam, having been killed by the regime by execution and assassination, respectively.

Is that part a lie? Why are they murdering one another's heirs and talking about successors to the dynasty?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (4 children)

Nepotism for sure. At least he stepped down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

In 2013, Clause 2 of Article 10 of the new edited Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System adopted by the government, states that the Party and revolution must be carried "eternally" by the "Baekdu bloodline".

The fuck is that shit?

 

I see the point being treaded all over the place. Father, son, and grandson have run the country for 70+ years, yet I keep seeing people refer to N. Korea as a democracy. Is this ironic joke memes, or just something going over my head?

 

Don Jr.? Ivanka? Matt Gaetz? Q Shaman?

 

Here's his wikipedia page

NY Times obituary if you want an idea of how the West portrayed him

Another wiki page about Cambodian genocide denial including this banger:

On June 6, 1977, Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman published an article in The Nation which contrasted the views expressed in books by Barron and Paul, Ponchaud, and Porter and Hildebrand, and in articles and accounts by Butterfield, Bragg, Kahin, Cazaux, Shanberg, Tolgraven and others. Their conclusion was: "We do not pretend to know where the truth lies amidst these sharply conflicting assessments; rather, we again want to emphasize some crucial points. What filters through to the American public is a seriously distorted version of the evidence available, emphasizing alleged Khmer Rouge atrocities and downplaying or ignoring the crucial U.S. role, direct and indirect, in the torment that Cambodia has suffered."

 

At least online, anonymity plays a part, but the discussions seem to have a lot of masculine energy to them. Is it maybe also like music, chess, or comedy where socialization plays a role in the male dominance?

I remember 60% of Bernie's constituency was female, but it doesn't seem to translate online. How can we work to attract more women to the movement?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Very well written.