Both are originally from the same author.
The old ublock got taken over by some asshole who removed credit and added shady monetization.
Both are originally from the same author.
The old ublock got taken over by some asshole who removed credit and added shady monetization.
I like the term "clogged mail"
Well I wouldn't want to get rummaged with piss hands.
Aint it great when paying gets you a worse experience.
I left another comment down there somewhere, but here's something
The most obvious tell to me is that it looks more like a filter than a real drawing. So far all AI drawings look like this. There's also details that I was able to pick apart:
Maybe it's because of different amounts of exposure to AI stuff or something, but the only feeling I can get from this style and the empty stares is that something's just off, and I hate looking at this so much.
Making an example is what NYT says, not EU. I'm kind of ignorant of the subject so I don't know what an "appropriate" fine would look like, but for the size of X and how bad it is, I'd expect it to be massive even without any ulterior motive.
The entire "art style" reeks of ai. Just look at those faces. It looks more like a filter than a drawing.
I think the uncanny look is caused by the generator being mostly trained on photos or 3d cgi instead of actual drawings.
Edit: There's also intent, which the generator couldn't handle at all. These peoples gazes are pointing at very weird directions and their expressions don't make any sense for the scene, or for what the image is supposed to convey.
The sheriff looks like he's being portrayed as tough, manly, and cool, while the native american is waiting for someone. The creepy SS officer is actually kind of okay, but the concentration camp victim is afraid of a scooby doo ghost. ICE dude is tired and waiting for his shift to end. The three people under him (why suddenly three?) have a "sad" expression that's more cartoony than serious.
You can always tell mastodon users apart from their weird posting behavior.
But I didn't even present them as mutually exclusive. Breaking the law is pretty much granted.
How is the law being applied inequally?
How is this is an example of (2), and not (1)? Is the law being applied inequally, or is it just that X is breakin it real bad?
Haven't seen a solar panel that can take a cloud of plasma many times the size of earth.